CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Cross-border social dialogue and agreements<br />
A pragmatic approach to the inclusion of international trade union<br />
rights in existing ILO standards could be to amend the industrial relations<br />
chapter of the Tripartite Declaration, recommending to member<br />
States and MNCs that these rights be respected in accordance with the<br />
suggestions advanced previously in this chapter. The voluntary character<br />
of the Declaration could certainly impact positively on the willingness of<br />
the ILO constituents to proceed with such amendments.<br />
Irrespective of the revision of the Tripartite Declaration so as to<br />
include international trade union rights, the ILO could promote the conclusion<br />
of IFAs through its In Focus Program on the Promotion of the<br />
ILO Tripartite Declaration. Associated with this programme is the newly<br />
created In Focus Initiative on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR),<br />
which “seeks to advance the ILO’s leadership in this area by promoting<br />
the principles laid down in the MNE Declaration as the foundation for<br />
good CSR policy and practice” (ILO, 2006b, para. 4). Although IFAs are<br />
not, strictly speaking, CSR initiatives, they could be presented as elements<br />
of good practices that firms can be engaged in with a view to<br />
respecting the principles laid out in the Tripartite Declaration.<br />
These suggestions would certainly help to create an international<br />
framework for the negotiation of international agreements. However, certain<br />
obstacles to the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining<br />
emanate, as previously mentioned, from national legislation. In<br />
turn, the ILO must continue to promote the ratification of Conventions<br />
by its Member States. The commitment of States to abide by recognized<br />
standards is only useful in so far as it is matched with concomitant action<br />
on the ground. Modifications to national laws as well as changes in institutions<br />
and practices are among the practical steps that are commonly<br />
required to ensure that States do not merely pay lip service to fundamental<br />
labour rights.<br />
Technical cooperation from the ILO is particularly vital in the<br />
process of labour law reform and judiciary training (ILO, 2004d). The<br />
ILO’s assistance guarantees that those involved in reforms at national<br />
level understand the background and are aware of the jurisprudence relevant<br />
to ratified Conventions. Experience with technical assistance programmes<br />
reveals that “changing attitudes, laws, institutions and practices<br />
require a sustained national effort over several years” (ILO, 2006b, para.<br />
10). Consequently, the ILO must not only promote respect for fundamental<br />
labour rights and international trade union rights to governments,<br />
246