23.12.2013 Views

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cross-border social dialogue and agreements<br />

In maritime shipping, social partner group strategies are closely tied<br />

into the internal politics and global collective bargaining strategies of the<br />

unions’ and shipowners’ international associations. A curious brand of<br />

global trade unionism and industrial relations has emerged from the ITF’s<br />

Flag of Convenience (FOC) campaign. The FOC campaign began in<br />

1948, when seafaring unions first took notice of attempts by some<br />

shipowners to “flag out” to developing countries with “flag of convenience”<br />

4 ship registers. Since the 1970s, the campaign emphasis shifted<br />

from ending the FOC system completely to wage bargaining for FOC<br />

seafarers. Since 2001, it has involved explicit global industry-level wage<br />

bargaining for seafarers on FOC ships (Lillie, 2004).<br />

The leadership of the shipowners’ group has been closely associated<br />

with IMEC, and IMEC’s policy of detente with the ITF. Part way<br />

through the negotiations, an internal power struggle took place among<br />

the shipowners. A new “hard-line” leadership emerged for a time, which<br />

was no longer as close to IMEC, and was unsure whether it really wanted<br />

the MLC at all. In the end, hard-line shipowner strategies did not prevent<br />

the Convention from being signed, or result in significant modifications<br />

to the text. The shipowners’ group finished the MLC negotiations<br />

under its original conciliatory leadership. The disruption reveals factions<br />

created by the variable influence of the ITF flag of convenience campaign<br />

on different shipowners’ groups, and different understandings in the<br />

industry of how best to react to ITF pressure.<br />

Significance of the ILO Maritime Labour<br />

Convention, 2006<br />

When the MLC comes into force, this will signal an important<br />

change in the way that global labour rights are governed in the maritime<br />

industry, but even more significantly it sets a precedent for labour rights<br />

and global governance generally. Although a logical continuation of current<br />

and ongoing developments, it codifies maritime shipping’s fundamentally<br />

new way of implementing labour standards. The MLC builds<br />

on maritime regulatory experiences from PSC; on the IMO’s 1995 Standards<br />

of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping convention and<br />

4<br />

Many shipowners prefer the term “open” register, but “flag of convenience” is probably the more<br />

commonly used term.<br />

194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!