CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cross-border social dialogue and agreements<br />
In maritime shipping, social partner group strategies are closely tied<br />
into the internal politics and global collective bargaining strategies of the<br />
unions’ and shipowners’ international associations. A curious brand of<br />
global trade unionism and industrial relations has emerged from the ITF’s<br />
Flag of Convenience (FOC) campaign. The FOC campaign began in<br />
1948, when seafaring unions first took notice of attempts by some<br />
shipowners to “flag out” to developing countries with “flag of convenience”<br />
4 ship registers. Since the 1970s, the campaign emphasis shifted<br />
from ending the FOC system completely to wage bargaining for FOC<br />
seafarers. Since 2001, it has involved explicit global industry-level wage<br />
bargaining for seafarers on FOC ships (Lillie, 2004).<br />
The leadership of the shipowners’ group has been closely associated<br />
with IMEC, and IMEC’s policy of detente with the ITF. Part way<br />
through the negotiations, an internal power struggle took place among<br />
the shipowners. A new “hard-line” leadership emerged for a time, which<br />
was no longer as close to IMEC, and was unsure whether it really wanted<br />
the MLC at all. In the end, hard-line shipowner strategies did not prevent<br />
the Convention from being signed, or result in significant modifications<br />
to the text. The shipowners’ group finished the MLC negotiations<br />
under its original conciliatory leadership. The disruption reveals factions<br />
created by the variable influence of the ITF flag of convenience campaign<br />
on different shipowners’ groups, and different understandings in the<br />
industry of how best to react to ITF pressure.<br />
Significance of the ILO Maritime Labour<br />
Convention, 2006<br />
When the MLC comes into force, this will signal an important<br />
change in the way that global labour rights are governed in the maritime<br />
industry, but even more significantly it sets a precedent for labour rights<br />
and global governance generally. Although a logical continuation of current<br />
and ongoing developments, it codifies maritime shipping’s fundamentally<br />
new way of implementing labour standards. The MLC builds<br />
on maritime regulatory experiences from PSC; on the IMO’s 1995 Standards<br />
of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping convention and<br />
4<br />
Many shipowners prefer the term “open” register, but “flag of convenience” is probably the more<br />
commonly used term.<br />
194