CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cross-border social dialogue and agreements<br />
with international organizations of workers and employers, they do not<br />
yet recognize the right to transnational collective bargaining or the right<br />
to exercise international solidarity actions such as cross-border sympathy<br />
strikes. Affirming these rights in a convention or another instrument,<br />
such as the Tripartite Declaration, would surely encourage social dialogue<br />
and collective bargaining at international level and contribute to redressing<br />
the imbalance of power between the parties to IFAs. Overall, this<br />
would create a favourable environment for the negotiation and implementation<br />
of IFAs. The recognition of trade union rights in international<br />
labour Conventions or other instruments relies, however, on the willingness<br />
of States to respond positively to the guidance and pressures of the<br />
ILO on the matter. Therefore, the opposition of some of the ILO’s constituents<br />
could prevent the adoption of a new instrument or the revision<br />
of existing ones.<br />
The ILO could also actively promote the negotiation of IFAs<br />
through sectoral activities and, more specifically, sectoral meetings. The<br />
latter can provide an international forum to discuss social dialogue initiatives<br />
and to allow dissemination of information and sharing of experience<br />
about IFAs. So far, discussions on IFAs have taken place at a few<br />
sectoral meetings, although these discussions were initiated by participants<br />
at the meetings and not put on the agenda by the ILO. A more<br />
proactive promotion of IFAs during sectoral meetings by the organization<br />
itself could bring about certain opportunities to negotiate agreements<br />
or joint understandings on fundamental labour rights. Sectoral<br />
meetings could in turn provide an international platform for the negotiation<br />
of IFAs. These prospects, however, are constrained by the limited<br />
number of sectoral meetings and the scarce resources available to them.<br />
The final means of action envisaged in this chapter is the provision<br />
by the ILO of dispute resolution services and technical assistance to trade<br />
unions and employers in order to further the effective implementation of<br />
IFAs. Offering dispute resolution services could assist the parties in solving<br />
existing disagreements concerning the application of the accords.<br />
Technical assistance could support capacity building that is needed by<br />
MNCs and trade unions to monitor and service the agreements adequately.<br />
The only serious obstacle to the ILO’s implementing this proposal<br />
seems to be limited resources.<br />
Certainly, other ways for the ILO to encourage growth of IFAs need<br />
to be explored. One of them would be through partnership with other<br />
international organizations. The report of the World Commission on the<br />
258