23.12.2013 Views

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cross-border social dialogue and agreements<br />

with international organizations of workers and employers, they do not<br />

yet recognize the right to transnational collective bargaining or the right<br />

to exercise international solidarity actions such as cross-border sympathy<br />

strikes. Affirming these rights in a convention or another instrument,<br />

such as the Tripartite Declaration, would surely encourage social dialogue<br />

and collective bargaining at international level and contribute to redressing<br />

the imbalance of power between the parties to IFAs. Overall, this<br />

would create a favourable environment for the negotiation and implementation<br />

of IFAs. The recognition of trade union rights in international<br />

labour Conventions or other instruments relies, however, on the willingness<br />

of States to respond positively to the guidance and pressures of the<br />

ILO on the matter. Therefore, the opposition of some of the ILO’s constituents<br />

could prevent the adoption of a new instrument or the revision<br />

of existing ones.<br />

The ILO could also actively promote the negotiation of IFAs<br />

through sectoral activities and, more specifically, sectoral meetings. The<br />

latter can provide an international forum to discuss social dialogue initiatives<br />

and to allow dissemination of information and sharing of experience<br />

about IFAs. So far, discussions on IFAs have taken place at a few<br />

sectoral meetings, although these discussions were initiated by participants<br />

at the meetings and not put on the agenda by the ILO. A more<br />

proactive promotion of IFAs during sectoral meetings by the organization<br />

itself could bring about certain opportunities to negotiate agreements<br />

or joint understandings on fundamental labour rights. Sectoral<br />

meetings could in turn provide an international platform for the negotiation<br />

of IFAs. These prospects, however, are constrained by the limited<br />

number of sectoral meetings and the scarce resources available to them.<br />

The final means of action envisaged in this chapter is the provision<br />

by the ILO of dispute resolution services and technical assistance to trade<br />

unions and employers in order to further the effective implementation of<br />

IFAs. Offering dispute resolution services could assist the parties in solving<br />

existing disagreements concerning the application of the accords.<br />

Technical assistance could support capacity building that is needed by<br />

MNCs and trade unions to monitor and service the agreements adequately.<br />

The only serious obstacle to the ILO’s implementing this proposal<br />

seems to be limited resources.<br />

Certainly, other ways for the ILO to encourage growth of IFAs need<br />

to be explored. One of them would be through partnership with other<br />

international organizations. The report of the World Commission on the<br />

258

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!