23.12.2013 Views

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cross-border social dialogue and agreements<br />

• the right to be consulted by and bargain with multinationals on the<br />

application and observance of core labour standards throughout the<br />

corporate structure, and throughout the supply chain;<br />

• the right to organise industrial action against multinational enterprises<br />

and the right of workers to take part in such action (Ewing<br />

and Sibley, 2000, p. 33).<br />

If the ILO were to endorse such a proposal, it would greatly promote<br />

the development of IFAs. First, it would encourage social dialogue<br />

and collective bargaining at international level. Second, it would partly<br />

redress the imbalance of power between parties to the agreements by<br />

allowing workers to put pressure on MNCs through the use of industrial<br />

action. However, the right to organize industrial action should not be the<br />

sole prerogative of international trade union federations, as the wording<br />

of Ewing and Sibley’s proposal suggests. In practice, transnational solidarity<br />

actions are sometimes coordinated by different national trade<br />

unions. A new ILO convention should adequately reflect this situation<br />

and allow national trade unions to take part in consultations with MNCs<br />

and to organize industrial action.<br />

While updating the existing ILO Conventions to ensure the protection<br />

of international trade union rights seems a valuable means of promoting<br />

the development of IFAs, concrete proposals to follow this course<br />

of action are likely to face strong opposition from some of the organization’s<br />

constituents, especially the employers’ group. At least, this is the<br />

prediction drawn from the history of the adoption of the ILO’s Tripartite<br />

Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and<br />

Social Policy in 1977 (ILO, 2006a).<br />

From the mid-1960s, concerns about the growing importance of<br />

MNCs on the international scene and the impact of their activities on<br />

social and labour conditions worldwide led the ILO to convene tripartite<br />

meetings to consider the opportunity for and possible forms of an ILO<br />

intervention on the matter. 16 During the discussions, workers’ experts<br />

and representatives expressed the need to extend protection, at international<br />

level, of the right of workers to take part in trade union activities<br />

16<br />

In 1967, the International Institute for Labour Studies organized a symposium on transnational<br />

industrial relations. In 1972, the ILO held a Tripartite Meeting on the Relationship Between Multinational<br />

Corporations and Social Policy. This was followed by two additional tripartite meetings on MNCs in 1976<br />

and 1977. The subjects and outcomes of these meetings are summarized at: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/multi/tripartite/history.htm.<br />

244

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!