23.12.2013 Views

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cross-border social dialogue and agreements<br />

European-level negotiations, and has signed the latest agreements which<br />

entailed the delegation of a mandate to negotiate from its affiliates. Thus,<br />

at least three types of coordination have been developed: between the<br />

national and EU levels; between the EWCs and the national unions<br />

involved; and between the EWCs and the EMF. Such coordination<br />

legitimizes and gives strength to these transnational agreements at company<br />

level.<br />

In some companies with important production sites outside<br />

Europe, unions wanted to include workers’ representatives from these<br />

sites in the EWCs. In some EWCs, representatives from outside Europe<br />

were actually accepted as “observers”. Volkswagen played a pioneering<br />

role in this movement. It had been the first automobile company to set<br />

up an EWC on a voluntary basis in 1990, before the adoption of the<br />

EWC Directive. In 1999 it was the first automobile company to create a<br />

WWC. Renault and DaimlerChrysler followed suit in 2000 and 2002.<br />

In these three cases, the existing EWCs served as a model and starting<br />

point for the creation of the WWCs.<br />

In the case of Renault, the new WWC, called the Renault group<br />

committee, incorporates the functions of an EWC and those of a<br />

“national group committee” (comprising delegates from the various<br />

national-level works councils of the group). In the cases of Volkswagen<br />

and DaimlerChrysler, the European and WWCs function in parallel and<br />

with a partial overlapping of membership. This facilitates coordination<br />

and organization of common meetings.<br />

The new WWCs have replaced the world company councils created<br />

by the IMF in the 1960s, which subsequently met sporadically. Given<br />

recent developments, the IMF has elaborated a multifaceted strategy. It<br />

now tries to transform the old IMF councils into smaller units, which<br />

would meet on a more regular basis and, if possible, with recognition and<br />

financial support from the respective MNEs. In the cases of Ford and<br />

GM, the IMF has created new union networks, called the Ford World<br />

Steering Committee and the GM Action Group. These union networks<br />

work in close coordination with the EWCs of these companies.<br />

The WWCs of Volkswagen, DaimlerChrysler and Renault have<br />

signed IFAs, all of them co-signed by the IMF. The EWCs of GM and<br />

Ford have done the same, but with no IMF co-signature and only European-wide<br />

validity of agreements on corporate social responsibility. In the<br />

case of GM, the agreement was also signed by the EMF. In all five cases,<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!