CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Cross-border social dialogue and agreements<br />
European-level negotiations, and has signed the latest agreements which<br />
entailed the delegation of a mandate to negotiate from its affiliates. Thus,<br />
at least three types of coordination have been developed: between the<br />
national and EU levels; between the EWCs and the national unions<br />
involved; and between the EWCs and the EMF. Such coordination<br />
legitimizes and gives strength to these transnational agreements at company<br />
level.<br />
In some companies with important production sites outside<br />
Europe, unions wanted to include workers’ representatives from these<br />
sites in the EWCs. In some EWCs, representatives from outside Europe<br />
were actually accepted as “observers”. Volkswagen played a pioneering<br />
role in this movement. It had been the first automobile company to set<br />
up an EWC on a voluntary basis in 1990, before the adoption of the<br />
EWC Directive. In 1999 it was the first automobile company to create a<br />
WWC. Renault and DaimlerChrysler followed suit in 2000 and 2002.<br />
In these three cases, the existing EWCs served as a model and starting<br />
point for the creation of the WWCs.<br />
In the case of Renault, the new WWC, called the Renault group<br />
committee, incorporates the functions of an EWC and those of a<br />
“national group committee” (comprising delegates from the various<br />
national-level works councils of the group). In the cases of Volkswagen<br />
and DaimlerChrysler, the European and WWCs function in parallel and<br />
with a partial overlapping of membership. This facilitates coordination<br />
and organization of common meetings.<br />
The new WWCs have replaced the world company councils created<br />
by the IMF in the 1960s, which subsequently met sporadically. Given<br />
recent developments, the IMF has elaborated a multifaceted strategy. It<br />
now tries to transform the old IMF councils into smaller units, which<br />
would meet on a more regular basis and, if possible, with recognition and<br />
financial support from the respective MNEs. In the cases of Ford and<br />
GM, the IMF has created new union networks, called the Ford World<br />
Steering Committee and the GM Action Group. These union networks<br />
work in close coordination with the EWCs of these companies.<br />
The WWCs of Volkswagen, DaimlerChrysler and Renault have<br />
signed IFAs, all of them co-signed by the IMF. The EWCs of GM and<br />
Ford have done the same, but with no IMF co-signature and only European-wide<br />
validity of agreements on corporate social responsibility. In the<br />
case of GM, the agreement was also signed by the EMF. In all five cases,<br />
60