23.12.2013 Views

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The role of the ILO in promoting the development – Drouin<br />

Sectoral meetings could, moreover, provide space for the negotiation<br />

of sectoral agreements such as that in the tobacco industry. That initiative<br />

brings together sectoral business associations, GUFs, nongovernmental<br />

organizations and enterprises in an effort to eliminate child labour<br />

in this field of commerce. Although the scheme focuses on one specific<br />

issue, it is nonetheless possible to envisage sectoral agreements covering<br />

the small spectrum of fundamental labour rights included in the 1998<br />

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Sectoral<br />

agreements or common statements on fundamental labour rights<br />

and social dialogue could extend the benefits ensuing from IFAs by<br />

broadening the current scope of the accords, which is limited to individual<br />

enterprises. The association of additional partners with sectoral initiatives,<br />

notably NGOs, could also bring extra resources for follow-up<br />

and implementation.<br />

These are optimistic scenarios since the benefits that can ensue from<br />

sectoral meetings in terms of social dialogue and agreements on fundamental<br />

labour rights are constrained in several ways. For one thing, the<br />

possibility of holding discussions on global social dialogue and IFAs<br />

during sectoral meetings depends on the topics that are put on the<br />

agenda. Priorities for each sector for the coming years have already been<br />

fixed by the ILO, but as the promotion of social dialogue is the primary<br />

strategic objective of the Sectoral Activities Branch, this should not prevent<br />

discussions on IFAs during meetings, if the ILO wants to make it a<br />

priority. <strong>An</strong>other limitation comes from the capacity of the participants<br />

at sectoral meetings: GUF representatives are invited as observers and<br />

their attendance is therefore theoretically not automatic. Affiliated trade<br />

unions can nonetheless express their interest in discussions about IFAs,<br />

as was done by IG Metall during a tripartite meeting of the transport<br />

equipment manufacturing sector (ILO, 2005c, para. 31). It also seems<br />

that it would be easier to negotiate an agreement at sectoral level when<br />

there is a counterpart of the GUFs on the employers’ side, that is, a sectoral<br />

employers’ organization. 23 The low frequency of meetings also limits<br />

their potential as a forum for discussion on IFAs.<br />

Sectoral meetings were a main focus of the Sectoral Activities<br />

Department (now Branch) until the last review of the programme that<br />

23<br />

To facilitate sectoral dialogue, the ICEM called for the creation of an employers’ organization in<br />

the oil and gas industry during a tripartite meeting of this sector, but this idea did not appeal to employers’<br />

representatives (ILO, 2002c, para. 6).<br />

251

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!