CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cross-border social dialogue and agreements<br />
These modifications were aimed at securing employers’ approval of<br />
the directive, since the reaction of MNEs and of the Union of Industrial<br />
and Employers’ Confederations of Europe (UNICE) to the project had<br />
been extremely negative. For the latter, the OECD Guidelines were quite<br />
sufficient and there was no need for European legislation. This position<br />
had the support of the UK Government of Prime Minister Margaret<br />
Thatcher. The threat of using its right of veto at the Council of Ministers<br />
was enough to prevent the adoption of the directive — at least until<br />
1994 when the Council of Ministers, by qualified majority voting,<br />
adopted the EWC Directive. (The new voting procedure was made possible<br />
by changes to the European Treaties at Maastricht in 1992.)<br />
The EWC Directive, which came into force on 22 September 1996,<br />
was partly inspired by the second version of the Vredeling project. It does<br />
not include mandatory bargaining in cases of restructuring but, instead,<br />
mandatory bargaining for the constitution of a body of employee representatives<br />
for the purposes of information and consultation in all MNEs<br />
employing at least 1,000 employees within the European Economic Area<br />
(EU plus Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein) and at least 150 in more<br />
than one Member State. It has nonetheless encouraged a particular form<br />
of transnational collective bargaining. The agreements for setting up<br />
EWCs constitute a particular European experience with transnational<br />
collective bargaining and, for the moment, the largest number of transnational<br />
collective agreements at company level, although they only concern<br />
procedures of representation and of information and consultation,<br />
and not concrete employment conditions.<br />
The EWC Directive seems modest from a legal perspective since it<br />
only grants information and consultation rights. It is not law concerning<br />
either trade unions or collective bargaining. There is currently no European<br />
legislation on transnational collective bargaining at company level,<br />
only on collective bargaining and tripartite consultation at the intersector<br />
and sector levels. Moreover, following the position of the UK Government,<br />
the Social Protocol — annexed to the Maastricht Treaty (1992)<br />
and subsequently the Amsterdam Treaty (1997) — explicitly refused to<br />
transfer legislative competence on wages, union rights or the right to<br />
strike to the EU. This makes it difficult in some EU Member States to<br />
organize solidarity strikes during transnational collective bargaining.<br />
The EWC Directive, however, does not exclude an evolution of<br />
the bargaining practices of the parties towards transnational collective<br />
bargaining at company level on a voluntary basis. From a sociological<br />
54