23.12.2013 Views

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cross-border social dialogue and agreements<br />

These modifications were aimed at securing employers’ approval of<br />

the directive, since the reaction of MNEs and of the Union of Industrial<br />

and Employers’ Confederations of Europe (UNICE) to the project had<br />

been extremely negative. For the latter, the OECD Guidelines were quite<br />

sufficient and there was no need for European legislation. This position<br />

had the support of the UK Government of Prime Minister Margaret<br />

Thatcher. The threat of using its right of veto at the Council of Ministers<br />

was enough to prevent the adoption of the directive — at least until<br />

1994 when the Council of Ministers, by qualified majority voting,<br />

adopted the EWC Directive. (The new voting procedure was made possible<br />

by changes to the European Treaties at Maastricht in 1992.)<br />

The EWC Directive, which came into force on 22 September 1996,<br />

was partly inspired by the second version of the Vredeling project. It does<br />

not include mandatory bargaining in cases of restructuring but, instead,<br />

mandatory bargaining for the constitution of a body of employee representatives<br />

for the purposes of information and consultation in all MNEs<br />

employing at least 1,000 employees within the European Economic Area<br />

(EU plus Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein) and at least 150 in more<br />

than one Member State. It has nonetheless encouraged a particular form<br />

of transnational collective bargaining. The agreements for setting up<br />

EWCs constitute a particular European experience with transnational<br />

collective bargaining and, for the moment, the largest number of transnational<br />

collective agreements at company level, although they only concern<br />

procedures of representation and of information and consultation,<br />

and not concrete employment conditions.<br />

The EWC Directive seems modest from a legal perspective since it<br />

only grants information and consultation rights. It is not law concerning<br />

either trade unions or collective bargaining. There is currently no European<br />

legislation on transnational collective bargaining at company level,<br />

only on collective bargaining and tripartite consultation at the intersector<br />

and sector levels. Moreover, following the position of the UK Government,<br />

the Social Protocol — annexed to the Maastricht Treaty (1992)<br />

and subsequently the Amsterdam Treaty (1997) — explicitly refused to<br />

transfer legislative competence on wages, union rights or the right to<br />

strike to the EU. This makes it difficult in some EU Member States to<br />

organize solidarity strikes during transnational collective bargaining.<br />

The EWC Directive, however, does not exclude an evolution of<br />

the bargaining practices of the parties towards transnational collective<br />

bargaining at company level on a voluntary basis. From a sociological<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!