CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The role of the ILO in promoting the development – Drouin<br />
but also provide governments with the means to introduce and achieve<br />
the reforms that are required at national level.<br />
Promoting IFAs through sectoral activities<br />
In his 2004 annual report to the International Labour Conference,<br />
the ILO Director-General pointed out that sectoral activities could present<br />
different opportunities to promote global social dialogue and to discuss<br />
labour issues related to global production systems (ILO, 2004c, 25).<br />
Sectoral work at the ILO dates back to the 1940s. It was initiated because<br />
of the recognition that certain labour and social issues have a specifically<br />
sectoral character and that general matters such as globalization, the<br />
impact of technological changes or the situation of specific groups of<br />
workers may raise different concerns and take different forms according<br />
to the sector involved. The overall objective of the Sectoral Activities<br />
Department (now Branch) is to facilitate the dissemination and exchange<br />
of information among ILO constituents on labour subjects that have an<br />
impact on particular sectors. For example, it undertakes research on topical<br />
sectoral matters, and through the organization of sectoral meetings it<br />
provides an international forum for governments and for employers’ and<br />
workers’ representatives to exchange views and form an international tripartite<br />
consensus on sectoral issues. The discussions held during these<br />
gatherings can lead to the adoption of conclusions and resolutions on<br />
issues that affect the sector concerned.<br />
The interest of sectoral meetings in the development of IFAs is that<br />
they provide space for transnational dialogue. In the absence of an international<br />
framework for collective bargaining, GUFs use various strategies<br />
to convince MNCs to conclude an agreement (Drouin, 2006). Among<br />
the different patterns of negotiation that can be identified from empirical<br />
study of the agreements, the most successful appear to be those involving<br />
national or local unions from an MNC’s country of origin in the<br />
negotiation of the accords and using European works councils (EWCs)<br />
as platforms for the conclusion of an agreement. This reveals that existing<br />
structures for social dialogue and collective bargaining at national and<br />
European levels play an important role in the development of IFAs. However,<br />
negotiating IFAs with GUF national affiliates or under the auspices<br />
of an EWC carries the risk of not involving all the relevant interested<br />
parties, notably workers in developing countries who are expected to<br />
247