23.12.2013 Views

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND AGREEMENTS: An ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cross-border social dialogue and agreements<br />

Major factors that appear to have contributed to the multiplication<br />

of IFAs in recent years include the following:<br />

(a) The trade union movement’s response to the challenges of globalization<br />

through a series of mergers in 1990-2006, so as to lead to<br />

the transformation of the ITSs into GUFs. The latest (and perhaps<br />

most significant) merger is that of the two largest international confederations,<br />

namely the International Confederation of Free Trade<br />

Unions (ICFTU) and the World Confederation of Labour (WCL)<br />

into the single International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC),<br />

on 1 November 2006 (Wills, 2002; Tørres and Gunnes, 2003;<br />

Bourque, 2005; Fairbrother and Hammer, 2005; Fairbrother et al.,<br />

2007).<br />

(b) The strengthening of endeavours at regional integration, especially<br />

in Europe, 8 favouring the creation of a supranational level of social<br />

representation. This is especially the case of the European social dialogue<br />

framework envisaged in Articles 138 and 139 of the Treaty<br />

Establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty — see Bé,<br />

this volume) and the establishment of EWCs by virtue of the EWC<br />

Directive of 1994. 9 This led to transnational employee representation<br />

bodies in MNEs operating in the European economic area and<br />

brought about a strengthening of European trade union umbrella<br />

organizations (or European industry federations), leading to European<br />

framework agreements and in general to a reinforcement of<br />

the idea of transnational dialogue and agreements in Europe (Block<br />

et al., 2001; Daugareilh, 2006; Fairbrother and Hammer, 2005).<br />

(c) A parallel move from “multi-employer” to “single-employer” bargaining<br />

(Marginson and Sisson, 1996). It should be underlined that<br />

although IFAs are transnational instruments, they concern a single<br />

employer and not an entire sector of activity (see also Sobczak, this<br />

volume).<br />

(d) The emergence of a new generation of managers’ and workers’ representatives,<br />

accustomed to a broad spectrum of innovative prac-<br />

8<br />

For an overview of the relevance of EWCs, see Sobczak (this volume). To a lesser extent, other<br />

regional integration endeavours favour supranational social representation: the North American Agreement<br />

on Labour Cooperation (NAALC) in the context of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA);<br />

and ad hoc initiatives in the context of the Southern African Development Community (SADC), such as the<br />

SADC Labour Relations Conference in October 1999 or the task team for improving conditions of employment<br />

in member countries established in February 2007.<br />

9<br />

European Works Councils Directive 94/45/CE. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/employment_<br />

social/labour_law/docs/directive94_45_en.pdf.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!