Influence of Maternal Prenatal Vitamin D Status on Infant Oral Health
Influence of Maternal Prenatal Vitamin D Status on Infant Oral Health
Influence of Maternal Prenatal Vitamin D Status on Infant Oral Health
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 77 caregivers resp<strong>on</strong>ded to the questi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> whether their infant had ever<br />
been breast fed to sleep. Of these, 70.1% (54) indicated that they had d<strong>on</strong>e so. Another 53<br />
caregivers provided resp<strong>on</strong>ses to the frequency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> breast feeding their child to sleep with<br />
the majority (52.8%) stating that this was a usual practice. Results from the infant<br />
questi<strong>on</strong>naire also determined that many children (39/69) were breast fed <strong>on</strong> demand, in<br />
that the child had the breast whenever they wanted it. It appeared that the majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
children who were breastfed (68.4%) received vitamin D drops.<br />
The majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> infants in this study were bottle-fed (96.3%) with <strong>on</strong>ly five<br />
resp<strong>on</strong>dents indicating that their child did not receive a bottle. One child was tube-fed for<br />
medical reas<strong>on</strong>s and was neither breast nor bottle fed. A c<strong>on</strong>siderable proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
infants were given the bottle from birth (40.5%) but the average infant age when the<br />
bottle was first introduced was 1.8 ± 2.8 m<strong>on</strong>ths (median 0.5 m<strong>on</strong>ths) ranging from birth<br />
to 15 m<strong>on</strong>ths <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> age. The majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> infants who were bottle fed were still taking the<br />
bottle at the time <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the study as <strong>on</strong>ly 21 caregivers indicated that their child was weaned<br />
from the bottle. Am<strong>on</strong>g those who were already weaned from the bottle, the average<br />
weaning age was 14.2 ± 4.8 m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />
The majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> participants indicated that their infant had g<strong>on</strong>e to bed with a<br />
bottle (82.3%) and that the frequency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this practice was usually (62.3%). Fortunately,<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly 39.8% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> caregivers indicated that their infant received the bottle whenever they<br />
demanded it.<br />
Comm<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tents in the bottle included formula (93.9%), water (90.0%), cow<br />
milk (88.5%), and apple juice (74.6%). Other c<strong>on</strong>tents included human breast milk<br />
(39.2%), tea (13.1%), and pop (9.2%). Interestingly, 40.6% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> resp<strong>on</strong>dents indicated that<br />
3-12