26.12.2013 Views

Influence of Maternal Prenatal Vitamin D Status on Infant Oral Health

Influence of Maternal Prenatal Vitamin D Status on Infant Oral Health

Influence of Maternal Prenatal Vitamin D Status on Infant Oral Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a significant associati<strong>on</strong> between 25(OH)D levels and the untreated decay rate (dt)<br />

(p=.046) while c<strong>on</strong>trolling for the influence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> other serum metabolites. In additi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

calcium levels were also significantly associated with dt scores. Lower prenatal calcium<br />

levels were indicative <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> higher dt scores.<br />

The sec<strong>on</strong>d model included those same independent variables that were in the<br />

expanded logistic regressi<strong>on</strong> model for ECC. Again, the same variables <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> enamel<br />

hypoplasia, infant age, and 25(OH)D were found to be significantly associated with the<br />

untreated caries rate when adjusted for the other potential influencing variables. Lower<br />

vitamin D levels were associated with increased untreated primary tooth caries rates.<br />

Naturally, there were some limitati<strong>on</strong>s to this study that are worth menti<strong>on</strong>ing.<br />

One <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the limitati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this study was the relatively small sample size and attriti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

the birth cohort. However, c<strong>on</strong>sidering the nature <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the study populati<strong>on</strong>, a retenti<strong>on</strong> rate<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nearly two-thirds is remarkable. We had in fact anticipated a loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> half <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the cohort.<br />

In order to deal with the foreseeable loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> participants, the decisi<strong>on</strong> was made to double<br />

our desired sample size at the outset <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this prospective investigati<strong>on</strong>. The small cohort<br />

size did restrict our ability to develop complex multivariate models for our outcomes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

interest.<br />

Overall, several women and their <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fspring were lost between the prenatal phase<br />

and infant study phase. This likely translated into limited statistical power and did result<br />

in several smaller regressi<strong>on</strong> models due to the small sample <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> infants. Fortunately, even<br />

though there were several losses to follow-up, it did not appear to negatively impact <strong>on</strong><br />

vitamin D assessments as there was no significant difference in vitamin D levels between<br />

those who remained in the study and returned with their infant and those lost to follow-up<br />

6-21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!