26.12.2013 Views

Influence of Maternal Prenatal Vitamin D Status on Infant Oral Health

Influence of Maternal Prenatal Vitamin D Status on Infant Oral Health

Influence of Maternal Prenatal Vitamin D Status on Infant Oral Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The next series <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> multiple regressi<strong>on</strong> analyses for 25(OH)D levels explored<br />

potential relati<strong>on</strong>ships between 25(OH)D levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> participants and independent variables<br />

gleaned from the prenatal questi<strong>on</strong>naire completed with subjects at the time <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> enrolment.<br />

Table 5.2 reports findings <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a regressi<strong>on</strong> model that included factors relating to prenatal<br />

health and prenatal care. This model included those prenatal independent variables that<br />

were significantly associated with maternal vitamin D levels like maternal health rating<br />

during pregnancy, whether their physician recommended prenatal vitamins, their use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

prenatal vitamins, and whether participants believed prenatal care to be important. This<br />

model revealed that both maternal health rating and use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> prenatal vitamins were<br />

significantly predictive <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 25(OH)D c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Another two similar multiple regressi<strong>on</strong> models were created with 25(OH)D<br />

c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s as the dependent outcome and included socioec<strong>on</strong>omic factors like food<br />

security, employment and income, educati<strong>on</strong>, and heritage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the mother at the time <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

enrollment. The difference between the two models was that the first model included<br />

overall household employment status (Table 5.3) while the sec<strong>on</strong>d included the mother’s<br />

annual income (Table 5.4). Results from the model presented in Table 5.3 indicated that<br />

Aboriginal heritage, household employment, and maternal educati<strong>on</strong> level were<br />

significant predictors <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 25(OH)D c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s during pregnancy. Those who were<br />

Aboriginal, had not completed high school, and lived in a home where no <strong>on</strong>e was<br />

employed <strong>on</strong> a full-time basis had lower levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> vitamin D.<br />

5-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!