26.12.2013 Views

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Salz</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

An Independent <strong>Review</strong> of Barclays’ Business Practices<br />

110<br />

of Barclaycard, in addition to Sir Hector Sants as Head of Compliance, and<br />

Shaygan Kheradpir as Chief Operations and Technology Officer.<br />

9.50 Particular consideration should be paid to ensuring that the CRO and Head of<br />

Compliance have the status among senior leaders so that their views are adequately<br />

taken into account. The primary responsibility for this must rest with the Group<br />

Chief Executive. The presence of control function leaders in the Group ExCo and in<br />

similar ExCos at business unit level will typically help to achieve a wider focus from<br />

all participants. The ExCo Chairmen at business unit level have an important role in<br />

ensuring that their ExCo is a meaningful part of the Group governance structure,<br />

with responsibilities for the overall Group’s success. The Chairman’s role in leading<br />

an ExCo should be reflected in his performance review and, as regards the Group<br />

ExCo, the Barclays Board should extend the annual Board evaluations to cover its<br />

oversight of the Group ExCo’s effectiveness.<br />

9.51 In making these suggestions we are less concerned about the formal governance<br />

framework for the executive team. Some organisations prefer an ExCo with<br />

collective decision rights; others, including the Barclays Group ExCo, reserve<br />

decision making for the Chief Executive. Some Chief Executives may prefer to have<br />

different groups of executives for Group Centre issues than for operational business<br />

issues. What matters is that the leadership group, and the Chief Executive in<br />

particular, is truly open to challenge and debate, that the right people are included in<br />

those debates, and that the team develops consistency in the management of<br />

the Group.<br />

Recommendation 10: Cohesive executive team<br />

The Group Chief Executive should be responsible for building a cohesive<br />

senior executive team which actively contributes to decision making through<br />

open debate and challenge. This should be reflected in his performance reviews<br />

and in the performance reviews of the senior executive team. The Board should<br />

regularly review the effectiveness of the senior executive team.<br />

Group Chief Executive Succession Planning<br />

9.52 The board has a primary role in choosing the chief executive. For as long as it has<br />

confidence in that chief executive and his team, it will tend to support him, while<br />

challenging particular proposals and regularly reviewing performance. Getting the<br />

appointment of the chief executive right is therefore very important, and so is the<br />

board’s process of developing succession plans in advance of any appointment.<br />

Done well, succession processes identify the skills and capabilities needed for the<br />

success of the organisation well ahead of a possible appointment, enable long-term<br />

development of future leaders internally and identify possible candidates externally at<br />

an early stage. For a universal bank like Barclays, it involves choosing the best person<br />

available in the world.<br />

9.53 In making its choice of Group Chief Executive, the Barclays Board should be<br />

mindful not just of the quality of candidates as individuals and their track records,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!