26.12.2013 Views

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Salz</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

An Independent <strong>Review</strong> of Barclays’ Business Practices<br />

68<br />

7. Regulatory and Tax Matters<br />

7.1 As noted earlier, banks play a vital role in modern economies and in the well-being of<br />

individuals and businesses. The biggest banks are of great importance to society as<br />

employers and taxpayers. They also carry significant risk such that politicians, central<br />

banks and regulators have developed a series of legal and regulatory requirements for<br />

them. Complying with these requirements and engaging with the regulators and other<br />

public bodies are essential responsibilities for banks and their managements. Failure<br />

to do so can inflict reputational damage on a bank and undermine public trust in it.<br />

7.2 The Barclays Board and senior management have rightly emphasised the importance<br />

they put on compliance with regulations and in regulatory relationships. 119 However,<br />

various regulators have expressed concerns about the bank’s historical engagement<br />

with them. Likewise, Barclays says that it goes to great lengths to comply with tax<br />

legislation, and to maintain an open relationship with Her Majesty’s Revenue and<br />

Customs (HMRC). However, some of the tax avoidance schemes that Barclays has<br />

promoted are now seen as aggressive and not in accordance with the spirit of the<br />

relevant tax legislation.<br />

7.3 In this section, we examine Barclays’ engagement with the regulators and the<br />

tax authorities.<br />

Regulatory Engagement<br />

7.4 Successfully managing various stakeholders and balancing their priorities is critical<br />

for all organisations. For banks, regulators are a vitally important stakeholder: they<br />

set the rules, supervise prudential financial strength and business conduct, challenge,<br />

and ultimately approve a bank’s licence to operate. A poor regulatory relationship can<br />

result in onerous challenges for management including withdrawal of a banking<br />

licence, increased capital and liquidity requirements, financial penalties, mandatory<br />

remediation exercises, restrictions on activities and, as was the case for Barclays,<br />

the departure of senior executives and Board members.<br />

7.5 The FSA Handbook contains eleven principles for regulated firms (see Exhibit 3).<br />

Principle 11 states: “A firm must deal with its regulators in an open and cooperative<br />

way, and must disclose to the FSA appropriately anything relating to the firm of<br />

which the FSA would reasonably expect notice.” 120<br />

7.6 An important element of fostering a positive and cooperative relationship with<br />

regulators is therefore open communication and transparency. Some<br />

communications from regulators will always need interpretation and some of their<br />

approaches should rightly be challenged. But banks must listen carefully and not<br />

interpret regulatory requests and feedback too narrowly. Both the Chairman and<br />

119 For example, after its settlement with the US authorities on 18 August 2010: “Barclays is committed to<br />

the highest levels of integrity and regulatory compliance across all of its operations”; Barclays, “Barclays<br />

Bank PLC settlement with US Authorities”, press release, 18 August 2010.<br />

120 FSA, The FSA Principles for Businesses; see: http://fsahandbook.info/FSA/html/handbook/PRIN/2/1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!