Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Salz</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />
An Independent <strong>Review</strong> of Barclays’ Business Practices<br />
68<br />
7. Regulatory and Tax Matters<br />
7.1 As noted earlier, banks play a vital role in modern economies and in the well-being of<br />
individuals and businesses. The biggest banks are of great importance to society as<br />
employers and taxpayers. They also carry significant risk such that politicians, central<br />
banks and regulators have developed a series of legal and regulatory requirements for<br />
them. Complying with these requirements and engaging with the regulators and other<br />
public bodies are essential responsibilities for banks and their managements. Failure<br />
to do so can inflict reputational damage on a bank and undermine public trust in it.<br />
7.2 The Barclays Board and senior management have rightly emphasised the importance<br />
they put on compliance with regulations and in regulatory relationships. 119 However,<br />
various regulators have expressed concerns about the bank’s historical engagement<br />
with them. Likewise, Barclays says that it goes to great lengths to comply with tax<br />
legislation, and to maintain an open relationship with Her Majesty’s Revenue and<br />
Customs (HMRC). However, some of the tax avoidance schemes that Barclays has<br />
promoted are now seen as aggressive and not in accordance with the spirit of the<br />
relevant tax legislation.<br />
7.3 In this section, we examine Barclays’ engagement with the regulators and the<br />
tax authorities.<br />
Regulatory Engagement<br />
7.4 Successfully managing various stakeholders and balancing their priorities is critical<br />
for all organisations. For banks, regulators are a vitally important stakeholder: they<br />
set the rules, supervise prudential financial strength and business conduct, challenge,<br />
and ultimately approve a bank’s licence to operate. A poor regulatory relationship can<br />
result in onerous challenges for management including withdrawal of a banking<br />
licence, increased capital and liquidity requirements, financial penalties, mandatory<br />
remediation exercises, restrictions on activities and, as was the case for Barclays,<br />
the departure of senior executives and Board members.<br />
7.5 The FSA Handbook contains eleven principles for regulated firms (see Exhibit 3).<br />
Principle 11 states: “A firm must deal with its regulators in an open and cooperative<br />
way, and must disclose to the FSA appropriately anything relating to the firm of<br />
which the FSA would reasonably expect notice.” 120<br />
7.6 An important element of fostering a positive and cooperative relationship with<br />
regulators is therefore open communication and transparency. Some<br />
communications from regulators will always need interpretation and some of their<br />
approaches should rightly be challenged. But banks must listen carefully and not<br />
interpret regulatory requests and feedback too narrowly. Both the Chairman and<br />
119 For example, after its settlement with the US authorities on 18 August 2010: “Barclays is committed to<br />
the highest levels of integrity and regulatory compliance across all of its operations”; Barclays, “Barclays<br />
Bank PLC settlement with US Authorities”, press release, 18 August 2010.<br />
120 FSA, The FSA Principles for Businesses; see: http://fsahandbook.info/FSA/html/handbook/PRIN/2/1.