26.12.2013 Views

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7<br />

<strong>Salz</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

An Independent <strong>Review</strong> of Barclays’ Business Practices<br />

everyday behaviours. And as a result there was no consistency to the development of<br />

a desired culture.<br />

2.16 However, culture exists regardless. If left to its own devices, it shapes itself, with the<br />

inherent risk that behaviours will not be those desired. Employees will work out for<br />

themselves what is valued by the leaders to whom they report. The developing<br />

cultures across Barclays were still less consistent as a result of a highly decentralised<br />

business model, that tended to give rise to silos. This left a cultural ambiguity at the<br />

heart of the bank.<br />

2.17 Successfully navigating the financial crisis and all its challenges may have combined<br />

to amplify some particular cultural characteristics. The struggle for survival,<br />

independent of government, dominated its activities. This led to a ‘backs against the<br />

wall’ mentality and a strong drive to win, “winning” being an evident part of the<br />

investment bank’s culture. The management team and the Board had to work hard to<br />

pass the regulator’s capital stress tests. Many suspected that they would fail. The<br />

crisis also offered a special opportunity to have a truly credible US investment<br />

banking capability. And so Barclays acquired parts of Lehman Brothers in the US.<br />

This added a significant integration challenge.<br />

2.18 The institutional cleverness, taken with its edginess and a strong desire to win<br />

(particularly in the investment bank), made Barclays a difficult organisation for<br />

stakeholders to engage with, especially where those stakeholders were themselves<br />

dealing with unprecedented issues. It stretched relationships with regulators and<br />

resulted in them and the market questioning some of Barclays’ financial information,<br />

especially its valuations of illiquid assets, and its control systems. Barclays was<br />

sometimes perceived as being within the letter of the law but not within its spirit.<br />

2.19 Other characteristics added to the risk of less than ideal outcomes. There was an<br />

over-emphasis on short-term financial performance, reinforced by remuneration<br />

systems that tended to reward revenue generation rather than serving the interests of<br />

customers and clients. There was also in some parts of the Group a sense that senior<br />

management did not want to hear bad news and that employees should be capable of<br />

solving problems. This contributed to a reluctance to escalate issues of concern.<br />

2.20 Transforming the culture will require a new sense of purpose beyond the need to<br />

perform financially. It will require establishing shared values, supported by a code of<br />

conduct, that create a foundation for improving behaviours while accommodating<br />

the particular characteristics of the bank’s different businesses. It will require a public<br />

commitment, with clear milestones and regular reporting on progress. It will require<br />

Barclays to listen to stakeholders, serve its customers and clients well get on with the<br />

work to implement its plans and stay out of trouble. The complexity of Barclays’<br />

businesses makes this a particular challenge for its leaders. It will take time before<br />

it is clear that sustainable change is being achieved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!