Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
11<br />
<strong>Salz</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />
An Independent <strong>Review</strong> of Barclays’ Business Practices<br />
don’t feel they can fully buy into an approach which so squarely links performance<br />
to the upholding of our values. My message to those people is simple: Barclays is not<br />
the place for you. The rules have changed. You won’t feel comfortable at Barclays<br />
and, to be frank, we won’t feel comfortable with you as colleagues.”<br />
2.36 Sir David Walker and Antony Jenkins acknowledge that there were gaps between<br />
Barclays’ publicly articulated values and its business practices. They accept that<br />
Barclays took some decisions which were based on short-term considerations and<br />
were not always in the interests of its customers. As Antony Jenkins said in the 2012<br />
Annual Report: “For the past 30 years, banking has been progressively too<br />
aggressive, too focused on the short term, too disconnected from the needs of our<br />
customers and clients, and wider society and we lost our way.”<br />
2.37 Antony Jenkins has launched the Transform Programme to address many of the<br />
issues we have explored. He has articulated the following values for Barclays: respect,<br />
integrity, service, excellence, and stewardship. 6 And, while the bank’s externally<br />
articulated objectives still include a financial focus to deliver a return on equity in<br />
excess of the 11.5% cost of capital, it is underpinned by a broader statement of<br />
purpose: ‘Helping people achieve their ambitions – in the right way’. 7<br />
2.38 This is a good start. To address the trust issues and restore its reputation, we suggest<br />
that Barclays should communicate openly and transparently how, and to what extent,<br />
it will implement our recommendations. The values of the bank must be explained<br />
to, and understood by, employees and potential recruits, and consistently translated<br />
into everyday behaviour. The bank should set out clear plans for achieving cultural<br />
change and monitor and report publicly on progress with implementation. And it<br />
must learn from mistakes, paying close attention to staff and customer feedback.<br />
All of this will take time, and demand focused commitment by all levels of the bank’s<br />
leadership in a period when the external environment and regulation continue to<br />
change.<br />
2.39 There is a paradox in all this. In their efforts to change, banks could uncover more<br />
of the legacy problems that have dogged the industry since the start of the financial<br />
crisis. Despite being the first to settle regulators’ investigations into its role in the<br />
attempted LIBOR manipulation and despite recognition of its cooperation in these<br />
investigations, Barclays seemingly suffered more reputational damage than its<br />
competitors. It would be unfortunate if this were to result generally in less<br />
cooperation and greater reluctance to settle issues arising from past problems.<br />
Accordingly, if in the change process Barclays discovers and brings to light past<br />
unsatisfactory behaviours, we hope that it will not be punished unnecessarily for its<br />
efforts and that recognition will be given to the challenges of achieving the<br />
transformational change on which Barclays has embarked.<br />
6 Barclays’ website: http://group.barclays.com/transform/values.<br />
7 Ibid.