Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Salz</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />
An Independent <strong>Review</strong> of Barclays’ Business Practices<br />
88<br />
escalate LIBOR issues within the investment bank and to the Group-level executives<br />
outside it. It is difficult to balance encouraging initiative, creating a culture of<br />
openness as to mistakes and enforcing a zero-tolerance approach to breaches. But<br />
that balance is critical in an investment bank.<br />
8.41 When revenue leads directly to pay, with insufficient consideration of other measures<br />
of success such as safeguarding reputation or respect for others, it is an enormous<br />
challenge to prevent a cultural drift toward a sense of entitlement. It is difficult for<br />
employees to give up that which they have been led to expect.<br />
8.42 The culture of Barclays Wealth up until 2006 was described as staid and in need of<br />
rejuvenation. In turning this around, its culture developed to be more like the<br />
investment bank than the retail bank. A Cultural Audit Report of Barclays Wealth<br />
Americas, which subsequently attracted media attention, 155 suggested an<br />
environment in which ambitious growth, financial incentives and revenue targets<br />
undermined support functions and led to a culture that was hostile to Compliance.<br />
A cultural change programme is now underway to address the issues.<br />
Retail and Business Banking (RBB) and Barclaycard<br />
8.43 The retail bank has a more diverse leadership history than the investment bank.<br />
Before 2005, RBB’s culture was characterised by an emphasis on strong relationships<br />
between bankers and customers. From around 2005, we observed that the leadership<br />
of the retail and commercial bank felt that they were being challenged to improve<br />
performance. In 2007, Frits Seegers was appointed to run GRCB. He drove its<br />
international expansion, some felt with insufficient focus on risks and controls.<br />
There was a material shift from client focus to one that valued scale and financial<br />
performance. Employees felt unable to question the new growth targets – which<br />
contributed to poor financial and acquisition decisions. Employees attribute this to<br />
a ‘culture of fear’ (particularly, it seemed a fear of not achieving targets) as well as to<br />
weak central oversight.<br />
8.44 Thereafter, the retail bank under the leadership of Antony Jenkins sought to renew<br />
its focus on customer relationships, with the business starting to focus on quality<br />
(rather than quantity) of business and to learn from recent mistakes. Employees<br />
directed us to numerous cultural initiatives in RBB, including implementation of<br />
upward feedback for all team leaders, introduction of employee opinion surveys and<br />
a cross-RBB customer complaints forum. Project LiMME (Lives Made Much Easier,<br />
introduced in 2010) demonstrates this sharper focus on developing a customercentric<br />
business. It attempted, through the eyes of employees, to identify what could<br />
be done to deliver improvements. In March 2012, RBB’s own employee interviews<br />
revealed a number of concerns – some more widely shared than others. A few broad<br />
themes did emerge, which illustrate some of the challenges the Group will face as it<br />
seeks to implement change:<br />
― Employees believed there was little collaboration at the level of the<br />
Group Executive Committee;<br />
155 Daily Mail, “Exposed: The regime of fear inside Barclays – and how the boss lied and shredded the<br />
evidence”, 20 January 2013.