Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Salz</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />
An Independent <strong>Review</strong> of Barclays’ Business Practices<br />
62<br />
Treatment of Customers<br />
6.39 We consider below particular challenges that Barclays has faced in balancing the need<br />
to treat customers and clients fairly with other (e.g., financial) objectives. These are<br />
examples of conflicts that will arise from time to time in ordinary dealings with<br />
customers. One relates to the retail bank, and the other to the investment bank.<br />
Charges for Credit Cards and Overdrafts<br />
6.40 The charges levied on customers for exceeding credit card limits and for<br />
unauthorised overdrafts on their current accounts have led to customer complaints,<br />
media campaigns, regulatory, OFT and government intervention, and legal battles<br />
involving the UK’s largest banks.<br />
6.41 At the heart of the problem is the sense that these charges are often high to enable<br />
banks to recoup the costs of not charging for other services: credit card users mostly<br />
pay no fees if they clear their outstanding balances promptly; and personal current<br />
accounts are free if in credit, as is the use of ATMs. There is therefore potentially an<br />
element of cross-subsidy involved with some charges, which raises challenging<br />
fairness issues for the banks.<br />
6.42 The first issue relates to credit card fees. The OFT, following a detailed review,<br />
declared in 2006 that “credit card default charges have generally been set at a<br />
significantly higher level than is legally fair”. The OFT estimated that this had<br />
involved unlawful penalty charges in excess of £300 million a year and said that, if<br />
default charges exceeded £12, it would “presume that they are unfair”. 103<br />
Accordingly, card issuers reviewed their charges, and Barclaycard, along with other<br />
issuers, reduced their charges to £12. Prior to 2006, Barclaycard had charged £20 to<br />
£24 per month.<br />
6.43 In addition, the UK Government reached agreement with the industry in January<br />
2011 on changes which included paying off the most expensive debt first and<br />
allowing customers to decline increases in their credit limit or even to reduce it.<br />
6.44 As a major UK card issuer, the cost of making these changes for Barclaycard was<br />
significant. Barclays also received customer complaints regarding credit card fees and<br />
charges and prior to 2012, compensating some customers. In 2012, Barclays<br />
calculated a cost-based justification of its £12 card default fee and does not expect to<br />
have to meet fee complaints in future.<br />
6.45 We have also considered the much publicised issue of UK current account charges.<br />
In its report into the UK current account market (published in 2008), the OFT<br />
concluded that “the … market is not working well for consumers. A combination of<br />
complexity and lack of transparency means that consumers and competition are<br />
focused almost exclusively on more visible fees, and not on the less visible elements<br />
103 Office of Fair Trading (OFT), “Current credit card default charges unfair” (68/06), press release, 5 April<br />
2006.