Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
Salz Review - Wall Street Journal
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Salz</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />
An Independent <strong>Review</strong> of Barclays’ Business Practices<br />
122<br />
Recommendation 17: Employee engagement<br />
Barclays should maintain a clear policy statement as to how it fulfils its purpose<br />
with respect to its employees. This should include the emphasis it places on<br />
training and personal development, promoting an environment of continuous<br />
learning, and non-financial forms of recognition for performance.<br />
Performance Development<br />
10.9 Performance development is Barclays’ formal process of reviewing employees’<br />
performance and providing guidance for their professional development. The annual<br />
performance review is the cornerstone of the performance development process.<br />
Individuals are assessed by their manager according to a set of pre-agreed objectives<br />
within a framework provided by business unit HR. Objectives may be both<br />
quantitative (e.g., sales performance) and qualitative (e.g., teamwork). Employees also<br />
write a self-assessment. The performance development system over the period<br />
covered by this <strong>Review</strong> was taken seriously but did not achieve the objective of<br />
supporting the development of appropriate business practices.<br />
10.10 Although we would expect some variation in the approach to performance<br />
development across different business units, we found there was a lack of a common<br />
Group-wide framework until 2012. Each business unit’s use of a different set of<br />
performance criteria resulted in an inconsistent emphasis on the importance of<br />
demonstrating the correct behaviours. The investment bank used a number of<br />
different performance development approaches; the common feature seems to have<br />
been a heavy focus on financial measures with limited behavioural assessment.<br />
10.11 In many cases managers were required to define for themselves the specific<br />
performance indicators against which to judge employees, including behavioural<br />
factors, and then to determine what constituted above or below average behaviour.<br />
In our review of a small sample of completed performance development forms,<br />
we found a heavy emphasis on financial or sales-oriented performance objectives.<br />
Customer service and teamwork were mentioned infrequently.<br />
10.12 Both of these issues are due to be addressed on a Group-wide basis through the<br />
Transform Programme. We understand that a new performance management system<br />
will be implemented. It will combine a balanced scorecard of performance objectives<br />
(the ‘what’) with a compulsory assessment of behaviours (the ‘how’) and a more<br />
detailed definition of how to determine overall performance development ratings<br />
based on the two. We believe these changes should greatly strengthen performance<br />
management and drive a broader understanding among employees of what strong<br />
performance entails – so long as the weightings are appropriate and the noncommercial<br />
factors are appropriately evaluated.<br />
10.13 We recognise that the effectiveness of the performance development process will<br />
depend on the diligence, discretion, competence and judgment of the manager<br />
responsible, and on all staff believing in its importance. During the course of the