26.12.2013 Views

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Salz</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

An Independent <strong>Review</strong> of Barclays’ Business Practices<br />

122<br />

Recommendation 17: Employee engagement<br />

Barclays should maintain a clear policy statement as to how it fulfils its purpose<br />

with respect to its employees. This should include the emphasis it places on<br />

training and personal development, promoting an environment of continuous<br />

learning, and non-financial forms of recognition for performance.<br />

Performance Development<br />

10.9 Performance development is Barclays’ formal process of reviewing employees’<br />

performance and providing guidance for their professional development. The annual<br />

performance review is the cornerstone of the performance development process.<br />

Individuals are assessed by their manager according to a set of pre-agreed objectives<br />

within a framework provided by business unit HR. Objectives may be both<br />

quantitative (e.g., sales performance) and qualitative (e.g., teamwork). Employees also<br />

write a self-assessment. The performance development system over the period<br />

covered by this <strong>Review</strong> was taken seriously but did not achieve the objective of<br />

supporting the development of appropriate business practices.<br />

10.10 Although we would expect some variation in the approach to performance<br />

development across different business units, we found there was a lack of a common<br />

Group-wide framework until 2012. Each business unit’s use of a different set of<br />

performance criteria resulted in an inconsistent emphasis on the importance of<br />

demonstrating the correct behaviours. The investment bank used a number of<br />

different performance development approaches; the common feature seems to have<br />

been a heavy focus on financial measures with limited behavioural assessment.<br />

10.11 In many cases managers were required to define for themselves the specific<br />

performance indicators against which to judge employees, including behavioural<br />

factors, and then to determine what constituted above or below average behaviour.<br />

In our review of a small sample of completed performance development forms,<br />

we found a heavy emphasis on financial or sales-oriented performance objectives.<br />

Customer service and teamwork were mentioned infrequently.<br />

10.12 Both of these issues are due to be addressed on a Group-wide basis through the<br />

Transform Programme. We understand that a new performance management system<br />

will be implemented. It will combine a balanced scorecard of performance objectives<br />

(the ‘what’) with a compulsory assessment of behaviours (the ‘how’) and a more<br />

detailed definition of how to determine overall performance development ratings<br />

based on the two. We believe these changes should greatly strengthen performance<br />

management and drive a broader understanding among employees of what strong<br />

performance entails – so long as the weightings are appropriate and the noncommercial<br />

factors are appropriately evaluated.<br />

10.13 We recognise that the effectiveness of the performance development process will<br />

depend on the diligence, discretion, competence and judgment of the manager<br />

responsible, and on all staff believing in its importance. During the course of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!