26.12.2013 Views

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

Salz Review - Wall Street Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

39<br />

<strong>Salz</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

An Independent <strong>Review</strong> of Barclays’ Business Practices<br />

5. The Struggle for Survival through the Financial Crisis<br />

5.1 By autumn 2007, leverage had built up to dangerous levels in the financial system<br />

globally. Banks became reluctant to lend to each other and liquidity dried up, leading<br />

to sharp falls in the value of many types of assets. The financial crisis led to a<br />

collapse of consumer and business confidence and a recession. Regulators in the<br />

UK and elsewhere increased the capital and liquidity requirements for banks to take<br />

account of possible stress conditions and intensified their supervision.<br />

5.2 The first sign of the financial crisis was the collapse of the US sub-prime mortgage<br />

market which left banks exposed to fast-growing losses on the complex securities<br />

created to finance such mortgages. It became difficult to value those illiquid assets<br />

which were held widely by many financial organisations, including the banks. This<br />

caused uncertainty around the recognition of losses, which would reduce capital –<br />

and with new capital hard to raise, the uncertainty caused them serious difficulties.<br />

5.3 In the turmoil, intensity and unpredictability of the financial crisis, most banks – and<br />

Barclays was no exception – were struggling to survive. Barclays was determined to<br />

remain independent. Among other things, it believed that independence would allow<br />

it to take advantage of opportunities that would arise during the crisis – a belief<br />

justified by the September 2008 Lehman transaction.<br />

5.4 Regulators took a close interest in the Barclays balance sheet because of the<br />

importance of the investment bank to its business. And Barclays was highly<br />

leveraged: its leverage at the end of 2008 was 43, higher than the other UK banks<br />

(RBS’s leverage was 30 at the time), but lower than Deutsche Bank and UBS. 51<br />

As was the case with a number of banks, leverage levels were not immediately<br />

apparent from its published information because of complex, off-balance sheet<br />

securitisations and derivatives.<br />

5.5 Following the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the UK government (and other<br />

governments around the world), in order to prevent a collapse of the financial system<br />

and with a view to restoring confidence, were anxious to support banks by providing<br />

sufficient capital to sustain their businesses through the crisis.<br />

5.6 In October 2008 Barclays came under particular scrutiny. Around the time that<br />

Government support was given to RBS and LBG, Barclays had to convince the<br />

Treasury and regulators that it was strong enough to survive independently.<br />

It persuaded the authorities that it was, subject to a plan to improve its capital<br />

position. It also passed the regulatory stress tests in 2009 and 2011.<br />

Illiquid Securities<br />

5.7 Barclays’ investment bank had expanded its US structured credit business quite<br />

rapidly before the crisis, most importantly through the acquisition of HomEq<br />

51 See Appendix I for UK banks’ leverage evolution; care must be taken when comparing leverage ratios<br />

between financial institutions in different jurisdictions, as rules for netting assets and liabilities may differ.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!