29.12.2013 Views

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was due to the despotic character of the Deys who became less tolerant of the<br />

lies and duplicity of the petty consuls and their countries.<br />

By late 18 th and early 19 th centuries, however, tribute acquired another<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g: it became synonymous of extortion or protection money. 68 While the<br />

Deys saw that it was the duty of consuls and their countries to present gifts, the<br />

Europeans “stress[ed] that gifts were not regular tributes” therefore they were<br />

“not expressive of European obedience.” 69 Undoubtedly, this ambiguity about<br />

the nature of tribute and consular practice attached to it resulted more from<br />

difference <strong>in</strong> cultural background and legal traditions than from any particular<br />

<strong>in</strong>satiability on the part of the Deys. It is also illustrative of the complexity of<br />

diplomatic relations between Algiers and the European countries.<br />

2. 4. Slavery and Redemption<br />

By the end of the 18 th century, the question of captives was already<br />

settled even though irregularities persisted. The different treaties between<br />

Algiers and the European countries <strong>in</strong>corporated the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of ransom or<br />

exchange of captives and the practice was largely accepted. A whole system of<br />

government or private <strong>in</strong>stitutions, procedures, and regulations was developed<br />

for the purpose. While el-fekkak or redeemer acted on the part of Algiers for<br />

68 This view was expressed early <strong>in</strong> American history by Benjam<strong>in</strong> Frankl<strong>in</strong> and echoed widely by<br />

American writers who largely disprove of the practice. The <strong>Diplomatic</strong> Correspondence of the<br />

American Revolution, be<strong>in</strong>g the Letters of Benjam<strong>in</strong> Frankl<strong>in</strong>, Silas Deane, John Adams, John Jay, and<br />

others, edited by Jared Sparks (Boston, MA: N. Hale and Gray & Bowen, 1829-1830), 4:184, Frankl<strong>in</strong><br />

to the President of Congress, December 25, 1783. (Hereafter cited as DCAR); also see James A. Field,<br />

Jr. “Trade, Skills, and Sympathy: The First Century and a Half of Commerce <strong>with</strong> the Near East,”<br />

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 401, America and the Middle<br />

East, (May, 1972), p. 2; Froth<strong>in</strong>gham, “The Armed Merchantman,” p. 465; Oren, Power, Faith, and<br />

Fantasy, p. 19-20.<br />

69 Muller, Consuls, Corsairs, and Commerce, p. 59.<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!