29.12.2013 Views

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

treaties <strong>with</strong> the western powers, payments <strong>in</strong> naval stores preserved their<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al mean<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

This research work has also detected a mutation <strong>in</strong> the mean<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

tribute and presents. By the end of the 18 th century, time at which Algiers came<br />

<strong>in</strong>to contact <strong>with</strong> the Americans, westerners corrupted the orig<strong>in</strong>al mean<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

tribute which then became synonymous of extortion or protection money.<br />

Moreover, European consuls transformed consular presents <strong>in</strong>to a form of<br />

corruption to obta<strong>in</strong> more favors and privileges but also to exclude their<br />

competitors. In the race for political <strong>in</strong>fluence and trad<strong>in</strong>g advantages at<br />

Algiers, western consuls and all sorts of adventurers <strong>in</strong>trigued, corrupted, and<br />

bribed state official. The more expensive were consular presents, the less the<br />

weakest and lesser-moneyed countries could compete. Therefore, presents lost<br />

their orig<strong>in</strong>al mean<strong>in</strong>g as symbols of office and were transformed <strong>in</strong>to a<br />

diplomatic arm by means of which European powers sought to exclude new<br />

competitors—like the United States—from Mediterranean profits.<br />

Fourth, contrary to western allegations, this work concludes that<br />

captivity at Algiers was not slavery and that it was not an exclusive <strong>Algeria</strong>n<br />

deed. Christian captives were not slaves but enslaved prisoners of war, an<br />

ancient tradition of war sanctioned by the law of nations and practiced on both<br />

shores of the Mediterranean bas<strong>in</strong>. As such, their enslavement was neither<br />

perpetual nor hereditary nor sanctioned by theories of biological <strong>in</strong>feriority as<br />

was the case <strong>in</strong> western societies. By their status of war prisoners, they could<br />

be liberated upon payment of ransom or exchange, also def<strong>in</strong>ed by legal<br />

393

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!