29.12.2013 Views

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and to Jefferson he wrote that it “has some curious features.” 85 It is however<br />

known from a letter of Randolph to Humphreys that President Wash<strong>in</strong>gton<br />

gave <strong>in</strong>structions for redeem<strong>in</strong>g the captives at a “limit of three thousand<br />

dollars per man”—we are here far away from Jefferson’s $100-200 apiece<br />

offered <strong>in</strong> 1786—but this appears nowhere <strong>in</strong> the treaty. 86<br />

The customary<br />

presents were not <strong>in</strong>cluded either, they were counted as regalian rights, or<br />

privileges attached to office, and were one of two po<strong>in</strong>ts the Dey <strong>in</strong>sisted on—<br />

besides naval material. Those <strong>in</strong>cluded a presents valued at $20,000 on the<br />

send<strong>in</strong>g of a new consul and biennial presents to officers of government<br />

estimated at $17,000. 87 For <strong>in</strong>significant annuities <strong>in</strong> naval stores, presents on<br />

arrival of a new ambassador, and biennial presents Algiers opened its markets<br />

and guaranteed the <strong>in</strong>terests of an American Mediterranean trade that,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to O’Brien, was mak<strong>in</strong>g profits of $1.5 million a year. 88 Overall, the<br />

document was most favorable for the United States; one may even affirm that it<br />

was a one-sided treaty. Apart from the above mentioned payments that were<br />

not even written <strong>in</strong> the treaty and which later became a matter of controversy<br />

and cheat<strong>in</strong>g, Algiers had all to lose by the terms of treaty.<br />

A quick look at the provisions of the treaty shows that n<strong>in</strong>eteen out of<br />

the twenty-two articles did not provide for reciprocity: 89 except from articles 3,<br />

4 and 19 which provided for immunity from capture on presentation of a<br />

85 LWJM, 2:82, To James Monroe, Feby 26, 1796 and ibid, 2:85, To Thomas Jefferson, Feb. 29, 1796<br />

respectively.<br />

86 ASP/FA, 1:529, Secretary of State to Colonel Humphreys, August 25, 1794.<br />

87 Bassett, Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of American Diplomacy, p. 108; ASP/FA, 3:33.<br />

88 As cited <strong>in</strong> Allison, The Crescent Obscured, p. 160.<br />

89 These remarks are based on the orig<strong>in</strong>al translation of 1795. Wherever flagrant disparities appear<br />

between the orig<strong>in</strong>al translation and that of 1830, parentheses are used for the purpose.<br />

319

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!