Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

ABSTRACT
Recent western writings deploying analogies between ‘Barbary piracy’ and twentyfirst
century ‘terrorism’ justify a reappraisal of diplomatic relations between the
Ottoman regency of Algiers and the United States during the period 1776-1816. Since
the 9/11 attacks, American historians have represented the ‘Barbary Wars’ as the
direct forerunner of current ‘Muslim terrorism’. For the purpose, they transposed late
18 th and early 19 th centuries events into the 21 st century; the result is an unsound
equation in which the ‘terrorist’ of today is likened to the ‘pirate’ of yesterday and by
reversal transposition, the Muslim corsair, already seen as a pirate, has been
transformed into a terrorist. This study opted for rereading the same material on which
current interpretations are built and reveals that, in many cases, documents pertaining
to that period were either overlooked or were not published until recently, a fact
which made this reappraisal possible. By reassessing relations between Algiers and
the USA, this work replaces the issue of ‘piracy’ into its true historical context and
discusses two major elements: the traditional clash between Islam and Christianity
and persistence of enmity towards Algiers in American foreign policy although under
a different guise. The analysis shows that allegations of Algerian aggressions against
the USA were unfounded and elaborates a ‘Dey-pawn theory’ which shows how
‘power politics’ entangled Algiers in major powers rivalries and turned it into a
scapegoat for Christianity. The work also investigates the amalgam between
corsairing and piracy and considers that its attribution to Muslims solely denotes a
renewal of medieval crusading because when America embarked on a gunboat
diplomacy, it also contended that Muslim corsairing states legitimated maritime terror
in the name of jihad. The thesis reconsiders America’s bullying past and unveils less
idealistic agendas that were performed in total disregard of laws and usage of nations.
The thesis concludes that Algerian seamen were not pirates but they were corsairs
legitimated in their actions by the very western standards and that assertions about
‘Algerine piracy’ were fabrications that were meant for cloaking gunboat aggression
in defensive disguise to promote American interests abroad.
v