22.01.2014 Views

2011 (SBTE) 25th Annual Meeting Proceedings - International ...

2011 (SBTE) 25th Annual Meeting Proceedings - International ...

2011 (SBTE) 25th Annual Meeting Proceedings - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

R.C. Cheb<br />

hebel.<br />

el. <strong>2011</strong>. Use of Applied Reproductive Technologies (FTAI, FTET) to Improve the Reproductive Efficiency in<br />

Dairy Cattle. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 39(Suppl 1): s183 - s202.<br />

non-treated cows. The increases in P4 concentration<br />

after GnRH treatment are smaller and less consistent<br />

compared with those observed after hCG treatment<br />

because hCG has a longer half-life than GnRH (30<br />

vs. 5 h) and, consequently, a more potent LH-like<br />

activity that not only causes new ovulations but<br />

extends the functional life of CL already present in<br />

the ovaries [18]. Lactating dairy cows treated with<br />

GnRH had higher pregnancy outcomes according to<br />

some [30,81] but not all studies [24,46]. In a metaanalysis<br />

conducted by Peters et al. [53], the effects of<br />

GnRH treatment 11 to 14 d after presumptive<br />

ovulation on pregnancy outcomes was evaluated<br />

based on 16 studies and 8,535 inseminations.<br />

According to this meta-analysis, the interaction<br />

between study and treatment affected the pregnancy<br />

outcomes, which deems this meta-analysis quite<br />

inconclusive [86]. When the authors included in the<br />

logistic regression important independent variables<br />

that could affect the pregnancy outcomes (e.g. OVP<br />

to which cows were submitted, cattle breed), however,<br />

GnRH treatment did not affect pregnancy outcomes<br />

[86]. In recent studies we conducted in dairies in CA,<br />

MN, and TX, we demonstrated that GnRH treatment<br />

at 17 or 31 d after presumptive ovulation did not<br />

reduce pregnancy losses from 31 to 66 d after AI<br />

[87], but cows treated with GnRH at 17 and 24 d<br />

after AI had greater P4 concentration at 31 d after AI<br />

and reduced pregnancy losses from 31 to 66 d after<br />

AI (7.5 vs. 11.9%) [88]. It is interesting to point out<br />

that according to this later study [88] there was a<br />

strong correlation between P4 concentration at 31 d<br />

after AI and incidence of pregnancy loss from 31 to<br />

66 d after AI (Figure 11).<br />

Treatment of cows and heifers with equine<br />

chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) during OVP has<br />

garnered interest for its potential to increase P4<br />

concentration after ovulation and increase pregnancy<br />

per AI or ET. In general, the studies that evaluated<br />

the effects of eCG treatment on P4 concentration and<br />

pregnancy outcomes attempted to promote hastened<br />

growth and ovulation of dominant follicles and,<br />

N<br />

Figure 11. Correlation between progesterone concentration 31 d after AI (P4) and pregnancy loss from 31<br />

to 66 d after AI. Pregnancy loss = 87.41 – (26.5 x P4) + (2.1 x P4 2 ); r 2 (Adj.) = 99.7%. Adapted from<br />

Scanavez et al. [88].<br />

consequently, increased P4 concentration after AI or<br />

ET by treating animals with eCG close to the expected<br />

time of ovulation [32,36,47,56,90]. Although these<br />

studies do not promote consensus regarding the<br />

effects of eCG treatment on pregnancy outcomes, it<br />

appears that anovular cows and cows with low body<br />

condition score would benefit the most from eCG<br />

treatment. On the other hand, treatment of embryo<br />

recipient lactating dairy cows with eCG around the<br />

time of follicular wave emergence to promote<br />

superstimulation and higher P4 concentration at the<br />

time of ET does not seem to improve P/ET (control =<br />

s197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!