22.01.2014 Views

2011 (SBTE) 25th Annual Meeting Proceedings - International ...

2011 (SBTE) 25th Annual Meeting Proceedings - International ...

2011 (SBTE) 25th Annual Meeting Proceedings - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B. Gasparrini. <strong>2011</strong>. Ovum pick-up and in vitro embryo production in buffalo species: an update.................................................................<br />

jjjjjjjjjjj Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 39(Suppl 1): s317 - s335.<br />

of a slightly higher percentage of competent oocytes<br />

(57%), without improving, though, the average blastocyst<br />

yields.<br />

The oocyte quality may be affected by several<br />

factors, such as the aspiration pressure during collection,<br />

the source of gametes, the time between collection and<br />

processing, the temperature during transportation, season,<br />

etc.<br />

In our experience, the oocyte morphology varies<br />

with the source of gametes, with an apparent worse<br />

quality of OPU-derived oocytes, characterized by fewer<br />

layers of granulosa cells, compared to abattoir-derived<br />

ones. A different distribution of COCs classes in relation<br />

to the oocyte source was also recorded in cattle, with a<br />

higher incidence of better quality oocytes for abattoirderived<br />

compared to OPU-derived COCs [76]. As this<br />

difference was not due to the OPU equipment or to the<br />

collection medium, it was hypothesized that, due to a postmortem<br />

effect, the COCs becomes less tightly connected<br />

to the follicle wall and therefore are collected with a more<br />

complete morphology. This is even more likely to occur<br />

in buffalo because of the poor adhesion of cumulus cells<br />

[44]. This feature led us to speculate that also technical<br />

factors during OPU, such as the length of the needle, as<br />

well as that of the line connected to the suction unit, may<br />

result in a greater loss of granulosa cells in buffalo oocytes<br />

and, hence in an underestimated evaluation of their quality.<br />

In fact, in contrast to what reported in cattle [76],<br />

despite their worse morphological appearance, OPUderived<br />

buffalo oocytes have a higher developmental<br />

competence compared to abattoir-derived ones [86]. Similar<br />

results have been obtained by Indian authors who<br />

reported both higher blastocyst yields (30.6±4.3 vs<br />

18.5±1.8) and higher blastocyst hatching rates (52.8±4.2<br />

versus 40.2±4.4) following embryo vitrification from<br />

OPU-derived compared to abattoir-derived buffalo<br />

oocytes [66].<br />

The improved embryo yield may be accounted<br />

for by the OPU-induced modification of the follicular<br />

dynamics; resetting the follicular population twice weekly<br />

results in increased follicular wave frequency and, hence<br />

in the aspiration of follicles before they become atretic,<br />

with an improved oocyte “quality”. On the contrary, an<br />

heterogeneous oocyte population is recovered from pooled<br />

ovaries of slaughtered buffaloes. In addition, it is worth<br />

reminding that buffaloes are usually slaughtered when<br />

they are old and/or hypo fertile. It has been suggested<br />

that the better embryo yields recorded in cattle for<br />

slaughterhouse compared to OPU-derived oocytes are<br />

due to early atresia occurring in the post-mortem which<br />

positively affects oocyte developmental competence [3].<br />

This does not seem to be the case in buffalo, suggesting<br />

that further studies are needed to elucidate the occurrence<br />

of atresia and its effect on the oocyte.<br />

It has been speculated that the better<br />

developmental competence of OPU-derived vs abattoirderived<br />

oocytes is related to the shorter exposure to<br />

environmental stress. Indeed, abattoir-derived oocytes<br />

spend a longer time between excision of ovaries from<br />

the peritoneal cavity and laboratory processing and are<br />

probably affected by cellular damages due to autolytic<br />

processes, especially when they reside in excised ovaries<br />

for prolonged periods.<br />

Furthermore, when OPU is carried out in the<br />

field, i.e. in farms distant from the laboratory, a significant<br />

improvement of blastocyst yield can be achieved by<br />

reducing the time between oocyte collection and their<br />

maturation. In these situations, an increased efficiency is<br />

recorded with oocytes searched directly in the farm and<br />

immediately transferred in a hepes-buffered in vitro<br />

maturation (IVM) medium in a portable incubator,<br />

compared with those searched in the laboratory, after<br />

many hours of their permanence in the follicular fluid N<br />

(Gasparrini, personal communication, 2006).<br />

The oocyte competence also depends on the<br />

morphofunctional state of ovaries, with an improved<br />

development recorded with oocytes recovered from<br />

ovaries bearing either a corpus hemorragicum or a CL,<br />

in the absence of a dominant follicle [68]. Furthermore,<br />

when a dominant follicle and a CL are present on the<br />

ovary, cleavage rate and transferable embryo yield are<br />

higher when oocytes are collected from the dominant<br />

follicle compared to the largest subordinate and<br />

subordinate follicles.<br />

Buffalo oocytes are very sensitive to shock<br />

temperature so it is important to monitor the temperature<br />

carefully during collection as fluctuations can easily occur.<br />

When OPU is carried out temperature is controlled by<br />

holding the collection tubes in suitable warm boxes. When<br />

abattoir-derived oocytes are utilized for in vitro embryo<br />

production, the ovaries are usually kept in physiological<br />

saline, under controlled temperature (30-37°C), during<br />

collection and transportation to the laboratory. It has been<br />

recently observed that oocyte developmental competence,<br />

s321

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!