2011 (SBTE) 25th Annual Meeting Proceedings - International ...
2011 (SBTE) 25th Annual Meeting Proceedings - International ...
2011 (SBTE) 25th Annual Meeting Proceedings - International ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
B. Gasparrini. <strong>2011</strong>. Ovum pick-up and in vitro embryo production in buffalo species: an update.................................................................<br />
jjjjjjjjjjj Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 39(Suppl 1): s317 - s335.<br />
of a slightly higher percentage of competent oocytes<br />
(57%), without improving, though, the average blastocyst<br />
yields.<br />
The oocyte quality may be affected by several<br />
factors, such as the aspiration pressure during collection,<br />
the source of gametes, the time between collection and<br />
processing, the temperature during transportation, season,<br />
etc.<br />
In our experience, the oocyte morphology varies<br />
with the source of gametes, with an apparent worse<br />
quality of OPU-derived oocytes, characterized by fewer<br />
layers of granulosa cells, compared to abattoir-derived<br />
ones. A different distribution of COCs classes in relation<br />
to the oocyte source was also recorded in cattle, with a<br />
higher incidence of better quality oocytes for abattoirderived<br />
compared to OPU-derived COCs [76]. As this<br />
difference was not due to the OPU equipment or to the<br />
collection medium, it was hypothesized that, due to a postmortem<br />
effect, the COCs becomes less tightly connected<br />
to the follicle wall and therefore are collected with a more<br />
complete morphology. This is even more likely to occur<br />
in buffalo because of the poor adhesion of cumulus cells<br />
[44]. This feature led us to speculate that also technical<br />
factors during OPU, such as the length of the needle, as<br />
well as that of the line connected to the suction unit, may<br />
result in a greater loss of granulosa cells in buffalo oocytes<br />
and, hence in an underestimated evaluation of their quality.<br />
In fact, in contrast to what reported in cattle [76],<br />
despite their worse morphological appearance, OPUderived<br />
buffalo oocytes have a higher developmental<br />
competence compared to abattoir-derived ones [86]. Similar<br />
results have been obtained by Indian authors who<br />
reported both higher blastocyst yields (30.6±4.3 vs<br />
18.5±1.8) and higher blastocyst hatching rates (52.8±4.2<br />
versus 40.2±4.4) following embryo vitrification from<br />
OPU-derived compared to abattoir-derived buffalo<br />
oocytes [66].<br />
The improved embryo yield may be accounted<br />
for by the OPU-induced modification of the follicular<br />
dynamics; resetting the follicular population twice weekly<br />
results in increased follicular wave frequency and, hence<br />
in the aspiration of follicles before they become atretic,<br />
with an improved oocyte “quality”. On the contrary, an<br />
heterogeneous oocyte population is recovered from pooled<br />
ovaries of slaughtered buffaloes. In addition, it is worth<br />
reminding that buffaloes are usually slaughtered when<br />
they are old and/or hypo fertile. It has been suggested<br />
that the better embryo yields recorded in cattle for<br />
slaughterhouse compared to OPU-derived oocytes are<br />
due to early atresia occurring in the post-mortem which<br />
positively affects oocyte developmental competence [3].<br />
This does not seem to be the case in buffalo, suggesting<br />
that further studies are needed to elucidate the occurrence<br />
of atresia and its effect on the oocyte.<br />
It has been speculated that the better<br />
developmental competence of OPU-derived vs abattoirderived<br />
oocytes is related to the shorter exposure to<br />
environmental stress. Indeed, abattoir-derived oocytes<br />
spend a longer time between excision of ovaries from<br />
the peritoneal cavity and laboratory processing and are<br />
probably affected by cellular damages due to autolytic<br />
processes, especially when they reside in excised ovaries<br />
for prolonged periods.<br />
Furthermore, when OPU is carried out in the<br />
field, i.e. in farms distant from the laboratory, a significant<br />
improvement of blastocyst yield can be achieved by<br />
reducing the time between oocyte collection and their<br />
maturation. In these situations, an increased efficiency is<br />
recorded with oocytes searched directly in the farm and<br />
immediately transferred in a hepes-buffered in vitro<br />
maturation (IVM) medium in a portable incubator,<br />
compared with those searched in the laboratory, after<br />
many hours of their permanence in the follicular fluid N<br />
(Gasparrini, personal communication, 2006).<br />
The oocyte competence also depends on the<br />
morphofunctional state of ovaries, with an improved<br />
development recorded with oocytes recovered from<br />
ovaries bearing either a corpus hemorragicum or a CL,<br />
in the absence of a dominant follicle [68]. Furthermore,<br />
when a dominant follicle and a CL are present on the<br />
ovary, cleavage rate and transferable embryo yield are<br />
higher when oocytes are collected from the dominant<br />
follicle compared to the largest subordinate and<br />
subordinate follicles.<br />
Buffalo oocytes are very sensitive to shock<br />
temperature so it is important to monitor the temperature<br />
carefully during collection as fluctuations can easily occur.<br />
When OPU is carried out temperature is controlled by<br />
holding the collection tubes in suitable warm boxes. When<br />
abattoir-derived oocytes are utilized for in vitro embryo<br />
production, the ovaries are usually kept in physiological<br />
saline, under controlled temperature (30-37°C), during<br />
collection and transportation to the laboratory. It has been<br />
recently observed that oocyte developmental competence,<br />
s321