07.03.2014 Views

Water Users Association and Irrigation Management - Institute for ...

Water Users Association and Irrigation Management - Institute for ...

Water Users Association and Irrigation Management - Institute for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

grazing l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the consequent reduction in availability of dung <strong>for</strong> manure. On the other<br />

h<strong>and</strong>. the dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> FYM is increasing every year, to replenish nutrients in the soil.<br />

Farmers are compelled to stall feed the cattle due to reduction in grazing l<strong>and</strong>s. It is<br />

estimated that animal s consume 40 to 55 percent of crop residues during the dry season 13 . It<br />

is also used <strong>for</strong> bedding in cattle pens, so only 52 percent of farmers burned crop residue.<br />

Some of the farmers used it as construction material or fuel. Even though green manuring<br />

was done by 59 percent of the farmers, application of FYM was not always followed by it.<br />

Some farmers either followed only !,'Teen manuring or application of FYM. It seems that<br />

farmers are either unaware or unwilling to try it.<br />

On-farm drainage has been provided by 96 percent of the sample farmers in Gundur, where<br />

the WUA is present. while in Hagedal only 71 percent of the farmers had drainage. In<br />

Gundur, the WUA is responsible <strong>for</strong> the maintenance of natural <strong>and</strong> collector drains <strong>and</strong><br />

farmers render their services in tenns of labor <strong>and</strong> money. In Hagedal, natural drains has<br />

disappeared due to siltation <strong>and</strong> the negligcncc of farmers. Farmers in this village expect<br />

that the agency should maintain the drains.<br />

It can be seen lTom Table 6.4 that around 116 percent of farmers interviewed followed the<br />

curative <strong>and</strong> preventive strategy in Gundur hut in Hagedal although soil-related problems<br />

were found to he more (sec Figure 5.1) only 64 percent of farmers interviewed followed<br />

these strategies. Although a large number of technological <strong>and</strong> management options are<br />

available to manage waterlogged <strong>and</strong> saline soils, often the strategies are not been adopted<br />

due to several socio-economic <strong>and</strong> institutional constraints (WOCAT, 1997).<br />

Other methods to reduce salinity, of which some farmers are aware but do not practice, is<br />

scraping <strong>and</strong> tlushing. Scraping involves physically removing the saline crust lTom the<br />

surface of the field to create a favorablc environment <strong>for</strong> seed germination <strong>and</strong> plant<br />

!,'Towth. Flushing involves running water over the surface of a field where impermeable salt<br />

crust is <strong>for</strong>med. Both of these are desperation acts <strong>and</strong> show that fertility of the soil is in<br />

extreme jeopardy (Abrol et al. 1988). As early as in 1914, Leather (reported by CABI,<br />

" However. there is a considerable potential <strong>for</strong> recycling soil nutrients by feeding crop residues to cattle as it<br />

. .' . (G t 1970) But often the feed given to cattle other than crop<br />

produces manure that IS rIch In nutrIents ran .<br />

reSidue is of poor quality.<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!