11.03.2014 Views

Improved Methodology for the Preparation of Chiral Amines

Improved Methodology for the Preparation of Chiral Amines

Improved Methodology for the Preparation of Chiral Amines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.3.2. Different Substrates Categories<br />

Several organometallic and organocatalytic systems were developed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

phenyl methyl (ethyl) N-aryl imines. The hydrogen source is ei<strong>the</strong>r molecular hydrogen or<br />

hydride reagents. Transition metals having chiral ligands on Ir, Ru, Rh and Ti were used and<br />

resulted in high yield and selectivity.<br />

Pfaltz and Leitner used cationic Ir complexes with chiral phosphinodihydrooxazoles modified<br />

with perfluroalkyl groups. [18] Using 0.09 mol % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> catalyst (catalyst 1, figure 2.4), 30 bar<br />

(435 psi) H 2 , supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO 2 ) at 40 °C an ee <strong>of</strong> 80% was accomplished<br />

with complete conversion (structure 1, figure 2.2). The choice <strong>of</strong> counter ion dramatically<br />

influenced selectivity with tetrakis-3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenylborate anion (BARF),<br />

resulting in <strong>the</strong> highest selectivity. They later developed <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> scCO 2 with ionic liquids<br />

and obtained <strong>the</strong> same result. [19]<br />

Zhang and Xiao reported one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earliest examples <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> efficient reduction <strong>of</strong> aryl<br />

methyl N-aryl imines utilizing iridium. They introduced <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> air stable Irbisphospahn<strong>of</strong>errocene<br />

catalyst (catalyst 2, figure 2.4). [20] Using 2.0 mol % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> catalyst<br />

(catalyst 2, figure 2.4), 70 bar (1015 psi) <strong>of</strong> H 2 , CH 2 Cl 2 , 25 °C over 44 h, 99% ee with 77%<br />

conversion <strong>for</strong> phenyl methyl N-aryl imines (structure 1, figure 2.3). For p-OMe-phenyl<br />

methyl N-aryl imines <strong>the</strong> ee was 98% with 77% conversion and <strong>for</strong> p-CF 3 -phenyl methyl N-<br />

aryl imine <strong>the</strong> ee was 99% with 80% conversion (structure 3, figure 2.3).<br />

Claver and Castillón introduced <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> sugar derived diphosphite ligands. [21] Using 1.0<br />

mol % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> iridium catalyst (catalyst 3, figure 2.4), 10 bar (145 psi) H 2 , CH 2 Cl 2 , 25 °C, 18 h<br />

an ee was 57% with 83% conversion <strong>for</strong> phenyl methyl N-aryl imine (structure 1, figure 2.3).<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> 4.0 mol % Bu 4 NI improved conversion (100%) but lowered <strong>the</strong> ee (46%) at 70 bar<br />

(1015 psi) <strong>of</strong> H 2 . Later <strong>the</strong>y reported <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r diphosphinite ligands (catalyst 4, figure<br />

2.4). Using 1.0 mol % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> catalyst, 70 bar ( 1015 psi) H 2 , CH 2 Cl 2 , 25 °C, 16 h, <strong>the</strong> ee was<br />

70% with complete conversion. [22]<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!