11.03.2014 Views

Improved Methodology for the Preparation of Chiral Amines

Improved Methodology for the Preparation of Chiral Amines

Improved Methodology for the Preparation of Chiral Amines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cozzi et al. developed <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> phosphino oxazolines derived ligands. [23] Using 0.1 mol %<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> catalyst (catalyst 5, figure 2.4), 50 bar (725 psi) H 2 , CH 2 Cl 2 , 25 °C, 4 h, <strong>the</strong> ee was<br />

86% with complete conversion <strong>for</strong> phenyl methyl N-aryl imine (structure 1, figure 2.3).<br />

Ru<strong>the</strong>nium catalysts earlier developed by Noyori <strong>for</strong> ketone reduction were useful <strong>for</strong> imine<br />

reduction which was tested by Cobley. [24] Using 1.0 mol % <strong>of</strong> RuCl 2 (diphosphine) (diamine)<br />

(catalyst 6, figure 2.4), 15 bar (218 psi) H 2 , 100 mol % <strong>of</strong> t-BuOK in t-BuOH <strong>for</strong> in situ<br />

activation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> catalyst, 65 °C, 20 h, <strong>the</strong> ee was 91% with complete conversion <strong>for</strong> phenyl<br />

methyl N-aryl imine (structure 1, figure 2.3).<br />

Grützmacher was successful in using mixed phosphane olefin ligand <strong>for</strong> imine reduction. [25]<br />

Using 1.0 mol % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> iridium catalyst (catalyst 7, figure 2.4), 50 bar (725 psi) H 2 , CHCl 3 ,<br />

50 °C, 2 h an ee <strong>of</strong> 86% with >98% yield <strong>for</strong> phenyl methyl N-aryl imine was reported<br />

(structure 1, figure 2.3).<br />

Niedercorn was able to reduce N-aryl imines with Ir-aminophosphine-oxazoline derived<br />

catalyst. [26] Using 2.0 mol % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> catalyst (catalyst 8, figure 2.4), 20-50 bar (290-725 psi)<br />

H 2 , CH 2 Cl 2 , 12 h an ee was 90% with full conversion <strong>for</strong> phenyl methyl N-aryl imine was<br />

reported (structure 1, figure 2.3).<br />

Andersson developed a new class <strong>of</strong> chiral phosphine-oxazoline ligands <strong>for</strong> iridium imine<br />

reduction. [27] Using 0.5 mol % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> catalyst (catalyst 9, figure 2.4), 20 bar (290 psi) <strong>of</strong> H 2 ,<br />

CH 2 Cl 2 , 25 °C over 2 h an ee was 90% with 98% conversion <strong>for</strong> phenyl, methyl N-aryl<br />

imines (structure 1, figure 2.3). He also tested his catalyst <strong>for</strong> reducing p-fluoro phenyl<br />

methyl N-aryl imine and reported 89% ee in 2 h, <strong>for</strong> p-OMe phenyl methyl N-aryl imine <strong>the</strong><br />

ee was 86% within 2-3 h, <strong>for</strong> p-chloro phenyl methyl N-aryl imine <strong>the</strong> ee was 89% within 1.5<br />

h with full conversion. In case <strong>of</strong> o-Me phenyl methyl N-aryl imine <strong>the</strong> ee was lower (83%)<br />

and <strong>the</strong> conversion was much lower (52%) after even 12 h (structure 3, Figure 2.3). Later<br />

<strong>the</strong>y reported 78% ee <strong>for</strong> phenyl ethyl N-aryl imines (structure 2, figure 2.3). 2-naphthyl<br />

methyl N-aryl imine was reduced with 91% ee. [28]<br />

Blom prepared a new class <strong>of</strong> diphenylphosphanyl sulfoximines ligands. [29] Using 1.1 mol %<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ir-Sulxoimine catalyst (catalyst 10, figure 2.4), 2.0 mol % <strong>of</strong> iodine, 20 bar (290 psi) <strong>of</strong><br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!