28.03.2014 Views

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Innovation & Intellectual Property<br />

The Nigerian leather industry has two dimensions: leather tanneries<br />

<strong>and</strong> leather accessories. The tanneries are clustered in the northern regions<br />

of Nigeria, where livestock rearing is prevalent. Odularu (2008) notes that<br />

“Nigeria is internationally efficient in goat <strong>and</strong> sheep skin leather exports”,<br />

with the red skin goat of unique quality highly coveted by <strong>for</strong>eign markets<br />

(USAID, 2002). Odularu further observed that exports in these products<br />

accounted <strong>for</strong> less than 1% of total exports in 2003. This suggests “that further<br />

development of the sector could result in [increased market access] <strong>for</strong> these<br />

products” (Odularu, p. 88). Makers of leather-based accessories <strong>and</strong> finished<br />

products are also located in the Northern region <strong>and</strong> in the cities of Lagos,<br />

Onitsha <strong>and</strong> Aba.<br />

3. The research<br />

The study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using communal trademarks to<br />

promote quality, competitiveness <strong>and</strong> market access of leather <strong>and</strong> textile products<br />

produced by small entities in Nigeria. The investigation focused on:<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

analysis of the framework <strong>for</strong> the protection of communal trademarks;<br />

identification of specific challenges faced by the producers that could be<br />

addressed through use of communal trademarks; <strong>and</strong><br />

identification of potential challenges to the use of communal trademarks.<br />

The study consisted of desktop research combined with a field work component<br />

that used a survey questionnaire <strong>and</strong> interviews. Leather <strong>and</strong> textile producers<br />

were chosen <strong>for</strong> study because of the socio-economic relevance of these sectors<br />

in relation to employment generation <strong>and</strong> poverty alleviation. In the case of textiles,<br />

their economic importance is inherent in the fact that Nigeria hosts whole<br />

sectors devoted to textile production, which are unique to the country. Second,<br />

the unique African fabrics <strong>and</strong> materials have distinctive local <strong>and</strong> international<br />

appeal. Third, the manual, family-based <strong>and</strong> other operators in the sector who<br />

apply traditional knowledge (TK) in the production processes have to contend<br />

with stiff competition <strong>and</strong> strong st<strong>and</strong>ards in the international market. This<br />

creates barriers to market access that would seem to make intervention necessary.<br />

A 2006 technical report on textile certification under the African Growth <strong>and</strong><br />

Opportunity Act (AGOA) noted that although AGOA’s Category 9 scheme <strong>for</strong><br />

qualifying folkloric textile products represented an attempt to encourage exports<br />

of small-scale, h<strong>and</strong>made folklore articles <strong>and</strong> ethnic printed fabrics, it often<br />

proved difficult to provide the historical <strong>and</strong> cultural documentation required to<br />

place a garment under Category 9 (WATH, 2006).<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!