28.03.2014 Views

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Innovation & Intellectual Property<br />

2. Conceptual <strong>and</strong> practical framework<br />

What are the conceptual, theoretical <strong>and</strong> pragmatic issues in relation to copyright<br />

<strong>and</strong> authorship in the context of Kenyan scholarship <strong>and</strong> publishing?<br />

Conceptualising <strong>and</strong> contextualising copyright in Kenya<br />

As stated above, the design of copyright <strong>and</strong> related rights systems has traditionally<br />

been based on two main competing theoretical perspectives: (1) the view<br />

that copyright protection acts as an incentive to promote knowledge development;<br />

<strong>and</strong> (2) the view that copyright protection can be an impediment to free<br />

<strong>and</strong> open exchange of knowledge (Cornish et al., 2010). Neither of these views<br />

has been subjected to sufficient empirical research in Kenya. As a result, law- <strong>and</strong><br />

policy-makers, as well as knowledge creators, will inevitably face problems if they<br />

seek to design <strong>and</strong>/or implement development-oriented approaches to copyright.<br />

This study sought to partially fill the knowledge gap by examining the potential<br />

roles of copyright in relation to development-oriented open scholarship in<br />

Kenya. The main research methods used were desk research (literature review,<br />

document analysis, doctrinal analysis) <strong>and</strong> field research (surveying, interviewing<br />

<strong>and</strong> focus-grouping stakeholders), <strong>and</strong> emphasis of the data analysis was qualitative.<br />

The key doctrinal source was Kenya’s Copyright Act No. 12 of 2001, which<br />

in Section 2 provides <strong>for</strong> copyright <strong>and</strong> related rights in primary works (such as<br />

literary, artistic <strong>and</strong> musical works), <strong>and</strong> in related, secondary, neighbouring or<br />

allied works (such as audio-visual works, sound recordings <strong>and</strong> broadcasts).<br />

Who is an author?<br />

The question of who is an author is contested in literary, legal <strong>and</strong> related scholarship<br />

(Bailey, 2000; Birnhack, 2008; Nehamas, 1986). This study focused on authorship<br />

in relation to literary works. Section 2 of Kenya’s Copyright Act contains a<br />

broad definition of literary work, which includes:<br />

● novels, stories <strong>and</strong> poetic works;<br />

● plays, stage directions, film sceneries <strong>and</strong> broadcasting scripts;<br />

● textbooks, treatises, histories, biographies, essays <strong>and</strong> articles;<br />

● encyclopedias <strong>and</strong> dictionaries;<br />

● letters, reports <strong>and</strong> memor<strong>and</strong>a;<br />

● lectures, addresses <strong>and</strong> sermons;<br />

● charts <strong>and</strong> tables;<br />

● computer programs; <strong>and</strong><br />

● tables <strong>and</strong> compilations of data including tables <strong>and</strong> compilations of data<br />

stored <strong>and</strong> embodied in a computer or a medium used in conjunction<br />

with a computer, but does not include a written law or a judicial decision.<br />

206

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!