28.03.2014 Views

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The State of Biofuel Innovation in Mozambique<br />

biofuels production in the country. According to the government’s National<br />

Policy <strong>and</strong> Strategy on Biofuels (NPSB) of 2009, one of the key policy aims is:<br />

To promote <strong>and</strong> explore agro-energy resources to guarantee energy security <strong>and</strong><br />

sustainable socio-economic development in order to contribute to the reduction<br />

of the emissions of gas with greenhouse effect, which contributes to the global<br />

warming, through selection <strong>and</strong> adoption of appropriate production technologies<br />

<strong>and</strong> methods in agriculture <strong>and</strong> industry. (NPSB, 2009, translated from Portuguese<br />

by the authors)<br />

The NPSB is based on several studies commissioned by the government, including<br />

a 2007 study that recommended pursuit of ethanol as a petrol additive <strong>and</strong><br />

pursuit of biodiesel (Econergy, 2007). The Econergy study report, released in<br />

2008, found that, <strong>for</strong> ethanol production, sorghum <strong>and</strong> sugar cane should be<br />

clear priorities, along with cassava (Econergy, 2008). For biodiesel, the best-suited<br />

crops among those already being cultivated were identified as coconut, sunflower,<br />

African palm, castor seed <strong>and</strong> jatropha. (The jatropha tree is a drought resistant<br />

<strong>and</strong> fast-growing plant that produces non-edible seeds high in oil that can be<br />

used <strong>for</strong> biofuel.) The 2008 Econergy report also concluded that implementation<br />

of a biofuel policy <strong>and</strong> strategy would have significant benefits <strong>for</strong> Mozambique,<br />

including:<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

expansion of the agriculturally productive area in order to produce raw<br />

materials;<br />

reduction of fuel importation , then estimated as costing US$20 million<br />

per year;<br />

increased tax revenues;<br />

creation of 150,000 new jobs;<br />

increase of exports; <strong>and</strong><br />

growth in the transportation sector (e.g. increase of traffic in ports)<br />

(Econergy, 2008).<br />

However, notably absent from the narratives of the private sector, <strong>for</strong>eign governments<br />

<strong>and</strong> the government of Mozambique is mention of a possible intellectual<br />

property (IP) dimension (specifically a patent dimension) to the drive towards<br />

large-scale biofuels production <strong>for</strong> the country. For instance, the a<strong>for</strong>ementioned<br />

assessment of biofuels in Mozambique, commissioned by the government <strong>and</strong><br />

conducted by Econergy, which <strong>for</strong>med the basis <strong>for</strong> the adoption of the NPSB of<br />

2009, does not contain a single reference to the role of IP in the development of<br />

the biofuels industry in Mozambique (Econergy, 2008).<br />

We set out to discover whether the lack of focus on IP issues in Mozambique’s<br />

biofuels strategy is perhaps a gap that needs filling. The study sought to underst<strong>and</strong><br />

249

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!