Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

African Patent Offices Not Fit for Purpose care and biomedical research”, Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 83–98. Miller, J. (2010), “Substance, procedure, and the divided patent power”, Administrative Law Review, Vol. 63, pp. 25–40. Morris, D. (1924), “The object and duties of the Patent Office”, Journal of the Patent Office, pp. 104–23. Mueller, J.M. and Chisum, D. (2008), “Enabling patent law’s inherent anticipation doctrine”, Houston Law Review, Vol. 45, pp. 1101–26. Murray, K.N. (2008), “The cooperation of many minds: domestic patent reform in a heterogenous regime”, IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 48, pp. 289–300. Oguamanam, C. (2006a), “Intellectual property rights in plant genetic resources: farmers’ rights and food security of indigenous and local communities”, Drake Journal of Agricultural Law, Vol. 11, pp. 273–305. Oguamanam, C. (2006b), International Law and Indigenous Knowledge: Intellectual Property, Plant Biodiversity, and Traditional Medicine, University of Toronto Press, Toronto. Oguamanam, C. (2008), “Local knowledge as trapped knowledge: intellectual property, culture, power and politics”, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 29–57. Sayre, R.J. (2012), “Inside perspective on patenting at the African Regional Intellectual Property Office”, inovia.com, available at: http://info.inovia.com/2012/01/insideperspective-on-patenting-at-the-african-regional-intellectual-property-office/ (accessed 15 March 2013). Thambisetty, S. (2009), Legal Transplants in Patent Law: Why Utility is the New Industrial Applicability, LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 6/2008, reprinted in (2009) Jurimetrics, Vol. 49, pp. 155–5. Wainwright, D.S. (1999), “Patenting around nuisance prior art”, Journal of Patent and Trademark Office Society, Vol. 81, pp. 221–30. 247
Chapter 11 The State of Biofuel Innovation in Mozambique Fernando dos Santos and Simão Pelembe Abstract This chapter provides findings and analysis from a study of the potential relevance of intellectual property (IP) dynamics (specifically patent dynamics) to small-scale, locally driven biofuel production in Mozambique. Through a policy and legal analysis, a patent landscaping exercise and stakeholder interviews, it was found that patenting is not at present the central barrier to successful small-scale biofuel exploitation in the country, but that patenting (and protection of utility models) is likely to become a more prominent issue in the coming years as Mozambique moves from first to second generation biofuel technologies. The chapter concludes that the government of Mozambique’s vision of a flourishing sector of smallscale biofuel producers will require aggressive government support, in line with its National Policy and Strategy on Biofuels (NPSB) of 2009, for a range of measures in support of locally driven technology research, innovation and development. Among the issues the government will need to tackle, according to this chapter, is the matter of how to ensure affordable access to technology – whether patented or non-patented – for small farming and producing enterprises to use and adapt (with use of “petty patent” utility models potentially being appropriate in some cases). 1. Introduction A number of local and foreign companies in Mozambique are producing, or setting up production facilities for, biofuels (ethanol and biodiesel) from agricultural products such as coconuts, jatropha and sugar cane. 1 The government of Mozambique is actively seeking to create the optimal policy framework for 1 For an in-depth account, from a non-IP- focused perspective, of Mozambique’s biofuel strategies see Schut et al., (2010).
Page 2 and 3:
Innovation & Intellectual Property
Page 4 and 5:
Contents Preface ..................
Page 6 and 7:
Preface This book is among the key
Page 8:
Preface mandated Train for Trade pr
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
About the Contributors Dr Perihan A
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 2 Frameworks for Analysing
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 6 The Policy Context for a
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222: Innovation & Intellectual Property
Page 259 and 260: Chapter 10 African Patent Offices N
Page 271: Innovation & Intellectual Property
Page 307 and 308: Chapter 13 Effects of the South Afr
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Chapter 14 Towards University-Indus
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Table 15.7: Importance of IP and ot
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433:
show all

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?