28.03.2014 Views

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

Geographical Indication (GI) options for Ethiopian Coffee and Ghanaian Cocoa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Perspectives on Intellectual Property from Botswana’s Publicly Funded Researchers<br />

Institutional funding <strong>for</strong> research<br />

Respondents were asked to rate the level of funding <strong>for</strong> research at their institutions<br />

from four sources: government, NGO, international <strong>and</strong> institutional.<br />

As Table 15.10 shows, 66% of the respondents rated government research funding<br />

support to their institutions as low, while 9% said it was high. A majority of<br />

respondents (63%) rated funding support from NGOs as low. International funding<br />

support <strong>for</strong> research was rated by 40% as medium, while 25% said it was high.<br />

Institutional funding <strong>for</strong> research was assessed to be low by 46%, medium by 40%<br />

<strong>and</strong> high by 14%.<br />

Table 15.10: Funding levels from different sources<br />

Rating of research funding<br />

from<br />

Government (n = 161<br />

respondents)<br />

Institution (n = 160<br />

respondents)<br />

International bodies (n = 159<br />

respondents)<br />

High Medium Low<br />

Number % Number % Number %<br />

15 9.3 40 24.8 106 65.8<br />

23 14.4 64 40.0 73 45.6<br />

40 25.2 64 40.3 55 34.6<br />

NGOs (n = 152 respondents) 16 10.5 40 26.3 96 63.2<br />

6. Conclusions<br />

The study found a lack of knowledge of the prevailing legal <strong>and</strong> policy frameworks<br />

governing IP at the institutional <strong>and</strong> national levels in Botswana. Although 54.2%<br />

of the researchers indicated that their institutions had IP policies, the majority of<br />

the researchers were unaware of the content of such policies. This lack of knowledge<br />

of the legal <strong>and</strong> regulatory framework is likely to hinder IP development<br />

<strong>and</strong> may be contributing to the low usage of IP rights. Maister et al. (2011) made<br />

similar observations about the lack of awareness of IP frameworks at research<br />

institutes <strong>and</strong> universities in Burundi <strong>and</strong> Rw<strong>and</strong>a, respectively.<br />

The lack of knowledge about commercialisation of research output from publicly<br />

funded research indicates that most researchers have failed to engage with<br />

their institutional IP policies. Botswana has a very low level of patenting (MCST,<br />

2005). The lack of knowledge about commercialisation may also point to the poor<br />

quality of research institutions’ IP policies. Creating awareness of IP <strong>and</strong> its utility<br />

in generating value from research outputs is a key area that requires urgent<br />

365

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!