30.05.2014 Views

Timothy to Hebrews - The Preterist Archive

Timothy to Hebrews - The Preterist Archive

Timothy to Hebrews - The Preterist Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

First <strong>Timothy</strong> V. 22. 141<br />

ordination of presbyters. This would do only in the case of ver.<br />

20 referring <strong>to</strong> the presbyters (comp. above); but even then it<br />

might be objected <strong>to</strong> this interpretation that such an injunction is<br />

not in its right place* here, but belongs <strong>to</strong> chap. iii. (Baur), that<br />

there, in fact, what is necessary <strong>to</strong> be said respecting the conditions<br />

of a2:)i3ointing <strong>to</strong> ofl&ce, has already been said, and more exactly<br />

than here, and that according <strong>to</strong> the qualifications there laid down<br />

the case here indicated in the words, he not partaker, etc., cannot<br />

well be supposed in reference <strong>to</strong> a presbyter, as De Wette has also<br />

observed. If the transition has already been made at ver. 20 from<br />

the presbyters <strong>to</strong> the members of the church generally, then ver. 22<br />

can also only be unders<strong>to</strong>od of receiving in<strong>to</strong> the Christian fellowship<br />

in general, or of res<strong>to</strong>ring <strong>to</strong> this fellowship those who had<br />

fallen.<br />

I prefer the latter view, with De Wette, from regard <strong>to</strong> ver.<br />

20, and on account of the he not partaker, etc. Ver. 20 does not<br />

indeed treat of exclusion from the church ; but the eXey^ig there is<br />

the next step <strong>to</strong> this (comp. Matth. xviii. 17), and the words, he<br />

not partaker, etc., evidently find a more natural explanation in accordance<br />

with this supposition. Meanwhile I admit that I do not<br />

regard these reasons as decisive. Olshausen has assented <strong>to</strong> that interpretation<br />

of this verse, which is the most ancient, and which is<br />

still the common one, according <strong>to</strong> which it<br />

is unders<strong>to</strong>od of ordination.<br />

On the laying on of hands, comjD. on iv. 14, According <strong>to</strong><br />

the view which we have taken, it is <strong>to</strong> be supposed that this laying<br />

on of hands was repeated on the res<strong>to</strong>ration of any one <strong>to</strong> church<br />

fellowship, which was certainly the practice at a later period ; comp.<br />

the proofs of this in De Wette. Baur explains the passage principally<br />

of the res<strong>to</strong>ration of heretics, of which he adduces examples<br />

from a later period which involve, however, no proof whatever<br />

against the apos<strong>to</strong>lical character of our passage. On i^irj raxeoo^<br />

Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m observes : TroXXaKig Trsptafceipdnsvog koX aKpifioJg i^erdaaq.-.—<br />

Be not p)artaker : <strong>Timothy</strong> adopts the gins which he overlooks, he<br />

becomes a partaker of these sins, inasmuch as he does not place<br />

himself <strong>to</strong>wards them in the attitude of a rebuker. On the dative,<br />

comp. Winer's Gr., § 30, 8, p. 180, 'L^avTov dyvhv rrpei : here, as<br />

De Wette rightly observes, oeavTov is placed first with emphasis ;<br />

it forms the antithesis with, he not partaker of other men's sins.<br />

For this very reason the clause cannot be explained <strong>to</strong> mean : keep<br />

thyself pure from such sins, but : thyself keep pure ; for in order<br />

<strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> rebuke the sins of others, <strong>Timothy</strong> must above all be<br />

pure himself. Thus the subject turns <strong>to</strong> the person of <strong>Timothy</strong>,<br />

as ver. 23 also shews ;<br />

a circumstance which it is also of importance<br />

<strong>to</strong> observe in reference <strong>to</strong> ver. 24, seq. 'Ayvog is therefore not<br />

<strong>to</strong> be taken in the special sense = chaste, but = pure, as at 2 Cor.<br />

vii. 11 : vi. 6.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!