30.05.2014 Views

Timothy to Hebrews - The Preterist Archive

Timothy to Hebrews - The Preterist Archive

Timothy to Hebrews - The Preterist Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

:<br />

<strong>Hebrews</strong> VIII. 5. 475<br />

tabernacle. Christ being not an Aaronite could not offer tbeie. B,<br />

But be must offer (somewhere and something), because every high<br />

priest must offer sacrifice. Consequently he needed another tabernacle<br />

than that of MoseSj (the only one that existed on earth). <strong>The</strong><br />

author now, however (just as at chap. vii. 15-17), passes forthwith<br />

from the thesis <strong>to</strong> the second and more remote member of the proof<br />

(B), and then brings in after it the first member of the proof, in<br />

the form of an explanation (of how far there lies in B an argument<br />

in proof of the thesis). <strong>The</strong> idea, therefore, takes this form : <strong>The</strong>sis<br />

Christ is minister in the true (namely heavenly) tabernacle. Argument<br />

: For every high priest must offer sacrifice ; therefore, Christ<br />

also must offer. (Supple. : from this follows, however, the above<br />

thesis, that Christ needed another tabernacle); /or, had he been<br />

priest in that earthly tabernacle, he would then have been no priest,<br />

as there were already priests there, who brought their offerings in<br />

conformity with the law.<br />

<strong>The</strong> words in detail have no difficulty. Awpa re koI Bvoiai as a<br />

general designation of the offerings, we had already at chap. v. 2.<br />

<strong>The</strong> author does not, of course, say of Christ that it was necessary<br />

for him <strong>to</strong> bring dC^pd re ical dvoiai, different kinds of offerings, but<br />

only that he must have somewhat <strong>to</strong> offer.<br />

Ver. 5.—Although grammatically connected with ver. 4 by a<br />

olnveg (which, however, may be well enough rendered by " and<br />

these"), ver. 5 contains an independent idea, a new argument for the<br />

thesis ver. 2, so stated as that this thesis itself, only in a more definite<br />

form, is fii'st repeated (the tabernacle in which the Levitical<br />

priests served is called an image and shadow of the heavenly things),<br />

and then the passage Ex. xxv. 40 is adduced as a new argument for<br />

the inferiority of the Mosaic tabernacle.<br />

Aarpeveiv with the dative of the person whom one serves is frequent<br />

; it more rarely occurs with the dative of the thing in which<br />

one serves (besides this passage comp. chap. xiii. 10). To take the<br />

dative in an instrumental signification would yield no sense. <strong>The</strong><br />

Levitical high priests served in a tabernacle which was an emblem<br />

and shadow of the heavenly things. "Ayca is not (with Bleek and<br />

others) <strong>to</strong> be supplied at rd enovpdvm ; the author has evidently<br />

rather, on purpose and with good reason, avoided placing a heavenly<br />

tabernacle in opposition <strong>to</strong> the earthly. True, in ver. 2, where in<br />

stating the thesis he wished <strong>to</strong> make an evident antithesis, he spoke<br />

of a "true tabernacle," a "true sanctuary;" from that place onwards,<br />

however, he avoids with intentional care every expression<br />

which might have led <strong>to</strong> the conception of a local sanctuary in<br />

heaven. Also in chap, ix., he again sets in opposition <strong>to</strong> the " holy<br />

places made with hands" only " the heavenly things" and " the<br />

things in the heavens," ver. 23. And, moreover, the whole reason-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!