30.05.2014 Views

Timothy to Hebrews - The Preterist Archive

Timothy to Hebrews - The Preterist Archive

Timothy to Hebrews - The Preterist Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

First <strong>Timothy</strong> V. 25. 145<br />

22 is explained of res<strong>to</strong>ration <strong>to</strong> the fellowship of the church, and<br />

in reference <strong>to</strong> this, ver. 24 is unders<strong>to</strong>od of the moral judgment<br />

pronounced by the church ; for, apart from every other consideration,<br />

it is not true that everything good as well as bad comes <strong>to</strong><br />

light in this judgment, nor can it be seen what end the sentiment<br />

was designed <strong>to</strong> serve, as it contains neither a direction as <strong>to</strong> the<br />

right procedure, nor an admonition <strong>to</strong> caution. Hence also De<br />

Wette, instead of referring maaoX. <strong>to</strong> ek Kpioiv—as that <strong>to</strong> which it<br />

is opposed, namely, -npoay. elg Kpioiv, shews he ought <strong>to</strong> do—takes<br />

it quite indefinitely :<br />

" there are some whose sins are known afterwards<br />

when they have passed over their (longer or shorter) way."*<br />

What way then ? According <strong>to</strong> the preceding, it can only be the<br />

way <strong>to</strong> the Kplaig. And how can InaKoX., if it is not referred <strong>to</strong> tbe<br />

KpLoiCj signify : they are afterwards known, seeing that, on the contrary,<br />

from its being opposed <strong>to</strong> npodrjXoi, it can only mean : they<br />

are hid ? And the whole of ver. 25 is superfluous on the supposition<br />

that it refers <strong>to</strong> the laying on of hands, ver. 22, in whatever<br />

sense this is taken. If vers, 24 and 25 accordingly can be unders<strong>to</strong>od<br />

only of the Divine judgment, it may be asked in what connexion<br />

does tbis stand with what precedes ? <strong>The</strong> reasons for referring<br />

vers. 24 and 25 exclusively <strong>to</strong> ver. 22, lay hands suddenly, etc., fall<br />

<strong>to</strong> the ground when it is unders<strong>to</strong>od, that it is neither the trial for<br />

the election of presbyters, nor the moral judgment of the church,<br />

of which they speak. <strong>The</strong> words are <strong>to</strong> be referred, then, rather <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>Timothy</strong> himself, of whom the apostle has been led <strong>to</strong> speak. He<br />

has been admonished <strong>to</strong> keep himself from the sins of others as well<br />

as from his own sins. This admonition is then explained and enforced<br />

in vers. 24 and 25, in which it said, that there are not merely<br />

open but also hidden sins, as well as open and hidden good works ;<br />

but the one class as well as the other is made manifest in the light<br />

of the judgment, only, that the one class go before as loud witnesses,<br />

the other as silent ones follow. Ver. 23 is indeed inserted between ;<br />

but I do not venture <strong>to</strong> guess here at any more strict connexion ; it<br />

could only be in this, that the apostle perceives even something impure<br />

beneath that ascetical vSpoTTo-elv, which was practised by <strong>Timothy</strong>.<br />

Schleiermacher, who justly dissents from <strong>The</strong>odoret with his<br />

elra rov nepl rrig ;:^eipoTOi'iaf dvaXaii[3dveL Xoyov on ver. 24, seq., and<br />

refers ver. 24, seq., strictly <strong>to</strong> ver, 23, explains the sentiment thus :<br />

the writer aims at consoling <strong>Timothy</strong> under his delicate health, by<br />

holding up before him the consideration, that all good works are not<br />

equally manifest through the rewards which they bring, but still<br />

that they cannot always remain hid. But wherefore then ver. 24 ?<br />

And not a word is here said of reward. And indeed the critical<br />

authorship is but <strong>to</strong>o apparent in the entire explanation. Olshausen<br />

finds in ver. 24, seq., the idea : that nothing in the man can be al-<br />

VOL. ^'I.—10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!