30.05.2014 Views

Timothy to Hebrews - The Preterist Archive

Timothy to Hebrews - The Preterist Archive

Timothy to Hebrews - The Preterist Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Hebrews</strong> VI. 4-6. 435<br />

Now, of him who has already passed over those stages in the<br />

Christian course and then falls away, it is here said that " it is impossible<br />

again <strong>to</strong> renew him/' i. e., the state of grace out of which<br />

he has fallen (the nerdvoia, conversion)* cannot he again res<strong>to</strong>red in<br />

him ; he is and remains lost. We must not shrink from these words<br />

or attempt <strong>to</strong> explain them away. <strong>The</strong> author assuredly does not<br />

mean (as some of the more ancient commenta<strong>to</strong>rs thought) that<br />

such a one is not <strong>to</strong> be again baptized, although he may notwithstanding<br />

be saved ;<br />

just as little does he mean that only men cannot<br />

save him, hut God notwithstanding may. He lays it down quite<br />

absolutely, " it is impossible <strong>to</strong> renew him again <strong>to</strong> conversion."<br />

This is one of those passages which speak of the so-called sin<br />

against the Holy Ghost, or more correctly of a fall that leads in<strong>to</strong><br />

irrecoverable perdition. It is well known, that on this subject<br />

there was a difference between the predestinarian Calvinists and the<br />

Lutherans, a difference extending even <strong>to</strong> the exegesis itself. <strong>The</strong><br />

Calvinists founded their view on the passage in Matth. xii. 31, seq.,<br />

in which Christ warns the unbelieving Jews against committing the<br />

sin against the Holy Ghost which can never be forgiven ;<br />

further, on<br />

the passage 1 John ii. 19, where John says of certain individuals<br />

who had fallen away from Christianity <strong>to</strong> Gnosticism :<br />

" <strong>The</strong>y are<br />

gone out from us, but they were not of us ; for if they had been<br />

of us they would have continued with us." Both passages were<br />

used by the Calvinists as a proof of the theorem that, a, one who<br />

is really born again cannot fall away, b, consequently he who falls<br />

away cannot have been really born again—a theorem which, we may<br />

observe, is not necessarily a consequence of the absolute doctrine<br />

of predestination, but is also conceivable independent of it. But<br />

how now is this <strong>to</strong> be reconciled with our passage Heb. vi. 4-6 ?<br />

with this passage in which we are taught that there may be a falling<br />

away from a state of faith in the fullest and most proper<br />

sense of the term. Calvin laid emphasis on the word yevodjj.evoi ;<br />

individuals are here spoken of who had but tasted a little of the<br />

gifts of grace, and had received only " some sparks of light.''<br />

But whoever is not blinded by dogmatical prejudices must peiceive,<br />

that the aim of our autbor is evidently and assuredly not<br />

<strong>to</strong> say : the less one has tasted of the gifts of grace the more<br />

easily may he be irrecoverably lost, but precisely the reverse ; the<br />

more one has already penetrated in<strong>to</strong> the sanctuary of the state of<br />

grace, by so much the more irrecoverably is he lost in case he should<br />

fall away.<br />

Our passage, therefore, unmistakeably declares the possibility<br />

that a regenerate person may fall away. But does it not herein<br />

contradict what is said in 1 John ii. 19. Not in the least ! If in<br />

* Others foolishly think that the state of Adam before the fall is here meant.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!