06.08.2014 Views

Non-Normative Gender and Sexual Identities in Schools: - Schools Out

Non-Normative Gender and Sexual Identities in Schools: - Schools Out

Non-Normative Gender and Sexual Identities in Schools: - Schools Out

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

St<strong>and</strong> Up For Us was therefore, the first policy to explicitly address homophobia <strong>in</strong><br />

schools <strong>and</strong> to acknowledge heterosexism/heteronormativity. It sets a background of<br />

underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g for LGB(T) issues <strong>and</strong> explores ways <strong>in</strong> which schools can challenge<br />

queerphobia by tak<strong>in</strong>g a whole school approach. This policy then, on the back of Section<br />

28’s repeal, had potential to build platforms for change, <strong>and</strong> given the subsequent<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction of general guidance such as <strong>Sexual</strong>ity the New Agenda (Creegan et al.,<br />

2007), which set out how local authorities can successfully engage with LGB<br />

communities 17 ; <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gender</strong> Equality Duty <strong>and</strong> <strong>Schools</strong> (Migniuolo, 2007), which<br />

specifically set out to elim<strong>in</strong>ate sex discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> promote equality <strong>in</strong> schools, one<br />

would have expected that by 2007 the situation for LGBT people <strong>in</strong> schools would have<br />

improved considerably.<br />

The School Report (Hunt <strong>and</strong> Jensen, 2007) highlights that this however, was not the<br />

case; this most recent research demonstrates that <strong>in</strong> spite of Section 28’s repeal <strong>and</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction of policies such as Don’t Suffer <strong>and</strong> St<strong>and</strong> Up For Us ‘homophobic bully<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is almost epidemic <strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>’s <strong>Schools</strong>’ (Hunt <strong>and</strong> Jensen, 2007: 2). The report was<br />

compiled by Stonewall 18 <strong>in</strong> collaboration with the School Health Education Unit <strong>and</strong><br />

surveyed 1145 LGBT young people. It <strong>in</strong>vestigated what homophobic bully<strong>in</strong>g looks<br />

like; who <strong>in</strong>flicts it; how <strong>and</strong> when it was responded to; the consequences of it; <strong>and</strong> what<br />

works well <strong>in</strong> challeng<strong>in</strong>g it. It found that queerphobic bully<strong>in</strong>g took many forms; these<br />

are highlighted <strong>in</strong> figure 1. <strong>and</strong> that 65% of ‘young lesbian, gay <strong>and</strong> bisexual people<br />

17 Note, this guidance does not address transgender communities.<br />

18 Stonewall was formed <strong>in</strong> 1989 as a response to Section 28. Stonewall puts equality on the ma<strong>in</strong>stream<br />

political agenda <strong>and</strong> is now recognised as the national lobby<strong>in</strong>g organisation for gay, lesbian <strong>and</strong> bisexual<br />

equality across all areas of life, work<strong>in</strong>g with a range of agencies to address the needs of lesbians, gay men<br />

<strong>and</strong> bisexuals <strong>in</strong> the wider community (see Stonewall, 2008).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!