06.08.2014 Views

Non-Normative Gender and Sexual Identities in Schools: - Schools Out

Non-Normative Gender and Sexual Identities in Schools: - Schools Out

Non-Normative Gender and Sexual Identities in Schools: - Schools Out

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ecause it’s gay or lesbian, or it’s heterosexual, you are just study<strong>in</strong>g it because it’s<br />

important to history. But it happens to be, have lesbian or gay content. In that way, do<br />

you th<strong>in</strong>k the curriculum is <strong>in</strong>clusive or do you th<strong>in</strong>k it still has a really heterosexual<br />

focus?<br />

SJ: Ur I would say that it probably has a heterosexual focus, but I I don’t feel I can really<br />

answer that honestly because obviously be<strong>in</strong>g a PE teacher. Well, all the texts that I use<br />

as a PE teacher, would never, it’s never anyth<strong>in</strong>g that would, you’d need to talk about<br />

whether it was a relationship or anyth<strong>in</strong>g, it’s all about factual based stuff. So I wouldn’t<br />

know cos I obviously don’t teach a subject that would br<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong>to play.<br />

AM: Yep.<br />

SJ: I wouldn’t, I don’t th<strong>in</strong>k I’d be able to comment on it fairly, cos I don’t know the<br />

exact texts that people use. But as far as I would be aware I would have thought more<br />

than likely it would be heterosexual based.<br />

AM: And <strong>in</strong> terms of um subjects aga<strong>in</strong>, perhaps sex education is a good example,<br />

perhaps not <strong>in</strong> your school from what you have just said, but do you feel that these<br />

subjects can ever actually be overtly homophobic, biphobic or transphobic, so for<br />

example if sex education only um heterosexual penetrative sex is talked about, that k<strong>in</strong>d<br />

of th<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

SJ: Ur no I would have thought, well I th<strong>in</strong>k it will vary massively depend<strong>in</strong>g on which<br />

teacher is deliver<strong>in</strong>g it. But <strong>in</strong> terms of lesson plans that you get given <strong>and</strong> resources that<br />

you get given ur for deal<strong>in</strong>g with sex education they’re very open <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusive of all<br />

different genders <strong>and</strong> it’s whether you feel comfortable talk<strong>in</strong>g about it I suppose as to<br />

how much you would go <strong>in</strong>to the different sides of it that you could go <strong>in</strong>to.<br />

AM: Right.<br />

SJ: So I th<strong>in</strong>k it vary massively, I th<strong>in</strong>k obviously younger staff on a whole would feel<br />

more comfortable hav<strong>in</strong>g open discussion about hav<strong>in</strong>g um different sexualities, but I<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k older staff would probably f<strong>in</strong>d that more difficult.<br />

AM: Yeah. OK, um go<strong>in</strong>g back a few years to your tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Um [//] I know you did your<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g through a one year PGCE course, um dur<strong>in</strong>g that year, obviously it’s a<br />

really <strong>in</strong>tense year, with loads of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> a massive amount of issues. Was there any<br />

<strong>and</strong> if there was what k<strong>in</strong>d of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g regard<strong>in</strong>g issues around gender <strong>and</strong> sexuality?<br />

SJ: Ur, um [//] not specifically. I remember we had tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g on how to deal with, well we<br />

had tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g on how to be <strong>in</strong>clusive <strong>in</strong> general. Um <strong>and</strong> obviously that <strong>in</strong>cluded sexuality<br />

issues. But it wasn’t, it was never specific focus, it was more you had, you did a topic on<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusion, so it would go <strong>in</strong> with that. But that was the most we ever looked at it. And I<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k that was a t<strong>in</strong>y part really of what, of the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />

AM: OK. So now hav<strong>in</strong>g been <strong>in</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g for, how many years, three years

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!