13.09.2014 Views

Local Area Networks (LANs) in Aircraft - FTP Directory Listing - FAA

Local Area Networks (LANs) in Aircraft - FTP Directory Listing - FAA

Local Area Networks (LANs) in Aircraft - FTP Directory Listing - FAA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(AJ) or low probability of <strong>in</strong>tercept/low probability of detection (LPI/LPD) waveforms are used.<br />

This study recommends further research us<strong>in</strong>g AJ waveforms for air-to-ground communications.<br />

8.4 NETWORK MANAGEMENT EXTENSIONS.<br />

Network management is a very significant network design issue that was previously discussed <strong>in</strong><br />

section 4.6. A basic network management tenet is that from a s<strong>in</strong>gle management station the<br />

authorized manager should be able to: learn the current state of the total network system, and<br />

perform the appropriate management functions. This tenet is challenged by the network<br />

partitions that occur by deploy<strong>in</strong>g VPNs. Because it is unlikely that crew members will have the<br />

sophisticated tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g needed to perform traditional network management functions, the network<br />

designers need to consider just how network management should be performed. This is a very<br />

important issue that is directly related to the underly<strong>in</strong>g concept of operations for aircraft.<br />

Relevant issues <strong>in</strong>clude the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

• Will many management functions become automated so that human managers will be<br />

presented with a high level of abstraction? If so, then the education requirements for the<br />

crew could be reduced, but what would happen should successful attacks occur aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

the automated management systems themselves (e.g., how will those successful exploits<br />

be discovered and handled)?<br />

• Will the network management of airborne aircraft actually occur from the ground? If so,<br />

then what would happen should the <strong>in</strong>tegrity of those management systems become<br />

compromised or air-ground connectivity be lost? In such a situation, will pilots have an<br />

override control capability? If so, how will the pilots discern that the <strong>in</strong>tegrity of the<br />

management system is <strong>in</strong> doubt?<br />

Because these issues are directly related to airl<strong>in</strong>e, manufacturer, and <strong>FAA</strong> the concept of<br />

operations, this study has not provided a well developed network management recommendation.<br />

Nevertheless, these issues need to be competently addressed and a viable network management<br />

system needs be designed if airborne LAN systems are to be safely networked.<br />

Figure 35 shows an example airborne network that has chosen to locate a network management<br />

station <strong>in</strong> the aircraft’s cockpit network. As previously discussed, this design would enable the<br />

network manager to potentially manage all of the devices with<strong>in</strong> the network except for those<br />

that are physically located <strong>in</strong> a VPN. It could not manage devices with<strong>in</strong> VPNs because it<br />

cannot “see” them (or even know about them) because they operate on a different IP protocol<br />

stack (i.e., an encapsulated one) than that used by the rest of the airplane.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!