2004 Customer Satisfaction Survey (PDF, 566 KB) - TEA - Home ...
2004 Customer Satisfaction Survey (PDF, 566 KB) - TEA - Home ...
2004 Customer Satisfaction Survey (PDF, 566 KB) - TEA - Home ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
death. We spend more than 6 weeks of our time testing. After the TAKS is over, everything else is<br />
anti-climactic. You are concerned about school violence, but you restrict the choices children are<br />
allowed to make to the degree that the only choices they can make are withdrawal (dropping out) or<br />
expulsion. TAKS is an expression of the same mentality that produced the ENRON meltdown. Satisfy<br />
certain people at ALL costs, Conformity at all costs. Learning differences and individuality are not<br />
allowed, viewed as failure.<br />
It is great to test skills and students. But to formulate questions so that many will miss it is unfair and<br />
does not prove anything. I feel that often, <strong>TEA</strong> wants to PROVE how great they are and use<br />
questions or accept questions to ensure that 100% accuracy is very rarely achieved. If skills are<br />
taught and children learn the skills there ought to be many that achieve 100% accuracy. Math tests<br />
should test math skills not reading skills. Reading tests test reading skills. I believe in having high<br />
standards. I usually have 100% passing rates in my classrooms TEKS and TAAS testing, but it is<br />
unfair to continually raise the standard without a stopping point!<br />
The progress of a student from one year to the next should be measured and not grade level<br />
attainment. Achievement beyond that average is excellence.<br />
The calculator requirement for the TAKS is an extreme burden. So much money is spent for use on<br />
those few days each year. The expense is excessive considering the funding issues.<br />
Currently, at the 3rd, 4th and 5th grade levels, students are being tested an inordinately large amount<br />
of times. It would seem that with TAKS, TPRI, Stanford, and OLSAT testing occurring so frequently<br />
we are testing more than teaching the skills that create competent, effective citizens that will lead us<br />
into the next generation of thinkers. With such a strenuous testing calendar students lack the time to<br />
learn through discovery which is the kind of learning that stays with them for a lifetime. I would like<br />
there to be a happy median for testing that would reflect accountability for teachers but allow children<br />
to learn in a non-threatening environment. Testing is about as threatening to students as lay offs are<br />
to working class American. Please do something about testing as a norm vs. learning for a lifetime.<br />
We need to go back to teaching school with the basic subjects. We are now just teaching our students<br />
to be test takers. This takes time away from our regular rounded curriculum.<br />
Too much testing. Do it in the beginning of the year, so we can see what they need that school year.<br />
Not at the end of the year, too late.<br />
TAKS testing.<br />
Authenticity and validity of making a single series of group, administered, paper, and, pencil,<br />
standardized tests the only bottom line for student, teacher and school success.<br />
What exactly does <strong>TEA</strong> do for the normal classroom teacher who has about 150 students! Can you tell<br />
me how to grade 150 essays and still manage to have time for family, etc? <strong>TEA</strong> has no impact on me<br />
personally other than the fact that they seem to have some arbitrary policy set forth that means<br />
nothing to someone in the trenches. How about lobbying for another way to fund schools? How<br />
about a higher wage for teachers instead of administrators? Sure, it’s what we hear all the time,<br />
“Let’s pay our teachers more,” but do we do it? The idea of tying it in with performance is ridiculous!<br />
You’re depending on a kid to dictate your pay. Would anyone in their right mind, in the "real world" do<br />
this? I don’t think so. Measuring education is arbitrary at best. Every kid is different and learning is a<br />
life-long process. We all know this to be true, yet we get hung up on TAKS results. The kids freak out<br />
from test anxiety. I have a ten-year-old who has done nothing but worry about the TAKS test. He<br />
makes very good grades and is a conscientious kid. Will this show up on the TAKS test?<br />
The focus on TAKS is too stressful for the students and the teachers.<br />
Bilingual students needing to be tested by the 2nd year here. Even though many say they have<br />
adequate education and consistent education, that is not the case. Many children come significantly<br />
below grade level and we have to work diligently on Spanish skills which limits the amount of time<br />
that can be spent on teaching English. We are not helping those students become successful in<br />
Texas.<br />
We are continually demanding more of our students that they are not mentally mature enough to<br />
handle. I am required to hold my 7th graders accountable for objectives that they are not mentally<br />
mature enough to grasp. In my view, it is like asking a kindergarten child to perform multiplication<br />
problems successfully by memory. They are not at that stage of development. The majority will not be<br />
successful.<br />
I am concerned that our students are not properly being prepared for the TAKS exit test. I am not sure<br />
what should be done, but it seems a bit burdensome to ask students to take several exit tests as well<br />
<strong>Survey</strong> Research Center, University Of North Texas<br />
127