2004 Customer Satisfaction Survey (PDF, 566 KB) - TEA - Home ...

Table 36
Effectiveness of Electronic Correspondence/Information Exchange
Average
Score
(1-5)
Strongly
Disagree
1
Percentage Responding
Disagree Neutral Agree
Strongly
Agree
5
2 3 4
Superintendents
(n=528) 3.79 1.9 9.1 19.7 46.8 22.5
Business Managers
(n=508) 3.85 2.0 7.7 14.8 54.5 21.1
Principals
(n=1,751) 4.02 0.7 5.1 13.8 52.1 28.3
Teachers and Staff
(n=2,237) 3.92 1.0 5.1 16.6 55.3 22.1
• Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with the statement, “Electronic
correspondence and exchange of information is more effective and efficient than
traditional paper processes” (see Table 36). Based on average responses, principals
(4.02) had the strongest level of agreement with the statement. Ratings of principals
were followed by business managers (3.85), superintendents (3.79), and teachers and
staff (3.92).
• The combined percentage of superintendents that either agreed (46.8 percent) or
strongly agreed (22.5 percent) with the statement that electronic correspondence and
exchange of information is more effective and efficient than traditional paper processes
was 69.3 percent.
• The combined percentage of business managers that either agreed (54.5 percent) or
strongly agreed (21.1 percent) with the statement that electronic correspondence and
exchange of information is more effective and efficient than traditional paper processes
was 75.6 percent.
• The combined percentage of principals that either agreed (52.1 percent) or strongly
agreed (28.3 percent) with the statement that electronic correspondence and exchange
of information is more effective and efficient than traditional paper processes was 80.4
percent.
• The combined percentage of teachers and staff that either agreed (55.3 percent) or
strongly agreed (22.1 percent) with the statement that electronic correspondence and
exchange of information is more effective and efficient than traditional paper processes
was 77.4 percent.
Survey Research Center, University Of North Texas
46