10.11.2014 Views

bQNs7mR

bQNs7mR

bQNs7mR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONCLUDING THOUGHTS<br />

What has the toolkit shown?<br />

The report does not offer a magic bullet for all communities and cities — far from it. But it does help to clarify<br />

the issues around supporting assets and let people see what needs to happen. It will help to move the debates on<br />

sustaining assets considerably beyond protests at public spending cuts, and should give hope to those eager to<br />

sustain assets in the longer run.<br />

The toolkit has introduced you to the three-pronged strategy of raising 1) awareness, 2) money, and 3) help. Each<br />

of these themes has offered novel perspectives. You have seen:<br />

• The suggestions that the benefits of assets need to be argued for and that the assets themselves must then be<br />

marketed in similar ways to private sector goods and services;<br />

• A sizeable menu of tax and civil society mechanisms for raising money — mechanisms that can be<br />

employed at different times and that have the benefits of also raising awareness even further and of creating<br />

or reinforcing social ties in cities and communities; and<br />

• Strategic ways for thinking about and selecting volunteers. The work has shown that volunteers are<br />

capable of doing many roles that assist assets. More importantly, these can be thought of as roots into local<br />

communities and sources of user feedback themselves.<br />

The toolkit has also outlined four resourcing models that can be employed to deliver on these strategies: 1)<br />

municipalism, 2) partnership, 3) residualism, and 4) privatism. How people see resourcing will depend heavily<br />

upon their own views of the rightful balance between government and civil society. How people are able to act<br />

upon this will depend heavily upon the capacities of their communities and cities; some places are likely to need<br />

some outside help from government and/or others.<br />

What the toolkit has hopefully shown is that whether you are more inclined to see government or civil society as<br />

the answer, some degree of involvement of both of these (so the residualism or partnership models) should augur<br />

well for keeping assets in the forefront of peoples’ minds. Like the barn-raising of old, the very act of raising<br />

awareness, money, and help is something that also has the welcome by-product of helping to build community,<br />

in addition to the many community-building and other benefits of the completed asset.<br />

163 | The New Barn-Raising

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!