bQNs7mR
bQNs7mR
bQNs7mR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CONCLUDING THOUGHTS<br />
What has the toolkit shown?<br />
The report does not offer a magic bullet for all communities and cities — far from it. But it does help to clarify<br />
the issues around supporting assets and let people see what needs to happen. It will help to move the debates on<br />
sustaining assets considerably beyond protests at public spending cuts, and should give hope to those eager to<br />
sustain assets in the longer run.<br />
The toolkit has introduced you to the three-pronged strategy of raising 1) awareness, 2) money, and 3) help. Each<br />
of these themes has offered novel perspectives. You have seen:<br />
• The suggestions that the benefits of assets need to be argued for and that the assets themselves must then be<br />
marketed in similar ways to private sector goods and services;<br />
• A sizeable menu of tax and civil society mechanisms for raising money — mechanisms that can be<br />
employed at different times and that have the benefits of also raising awareness even further and of creating<br />
or reinforcing social ties in cities and communities; and<br />
• Strategic ways for thinking about and selecting volunteers. The work has shown that volunteers are<br />
capable of doing many roles that assist assets. More importantly, these can be thought of as roots into local<br />
communities and sources of user feedback themselves.<br />
The toolkit has also outlined four resourcing models that can be employed to deliver on these strategies: 1)<br />
municipalism, 2) partnership, 3) residualism, and 4) privatism. How people see resourcing will depend heavily<br />
upon their own views of the rightful balance between government and civil society. How people are able to act<br />
upon this will depend heavily upon the capacities of their communities and cities; some places are likely to need<br />
some outside help from government and/or others.<br />
What the toolkit has hopefully shown is that whether you are more inclined to see government or civil society as<br />
the answer, some degree of involvement of both of these (so the residualism or partnership models) should augur<br />
well for keeping assets in the forefront of peoples’ minds. Like the barn-raising of old, the very act of raising<br />
awareness, money, and help is something that also has the welcome by-product of helping to build community,<br />
in addition to the many community-building and other benefits of the completed asset.<br />
163 | The New Barn-Raising