bQNs7mR
bQNs7mR
bQNs7mR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• Hand over a building that is an asset not a liability: Buildings ideally need to be operational when<br />
handed over. They must be structurally sound, secure, compliant with the Americans with Disabilities<br />
Act (ADA) and health and safety regulations and, ideally, have high-level kitchen facilities (not least with<br />
a view to having fundraising events there). For example, the Phillips Community Center in Minneapolis<br />
was saved from demolition and is now jointly run between the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board<br />
and paying tenants. However, the board paid for rebuilding the roof, the electrical, heating, and air<br />
conditioning systems, and other needed maintenance.<br />
• Efficient partner selection process: City councils need to have in place a Request for Proposals (RFP)<br />
process that rapidly sorts out organizations and groups that are provisionally interested in taking on one or<br />
more assets from those that are not only interested but also have many of the key factors in place for taking<br />
on the responsibility successfully. This minimizes wasted effort and disappointment.<br />
• Legislation needed: There may need to be changes to city ordinances and state laws. For example, the nonprofit<br />
management of several California State Parks has been possible because of the passing of Assembly<br />
Bill 42, which smoothed the way for non-profit groups to take over (up to 20) park operations between<br />
now and 2019.<br />
#2 – Post-transfer<br />
• Management assistance: Management assistance may be needed for rec center managers, which could<br />
mean advice on programming and/or day-to-day management of a building.<br />
• Maintenance: With the St. Paul rec centers, the city agrees to maintain the building exterior whilst the<br />
service partner is responsible for the interiors. The Department of Recreation and Parks mows the fields<br />
and collects the trash.<br />
• Financial assistance: Baltimore City Council has made some start-up funding available for rec centers that<br />
come under non-profit ownership. In both Baltimore and St. Paul, the rent for non-profit run rec centers<br />
is minimal, leaving the organizations with utility costs and minor maintenance. With the Detroit Eastern<br />
Market, operational funding from the city of Detroit was withdrawn gradually, not “overnight.”<br />
• Creation of a special-purpose charitable foundation: Baltimore’s Parks and People Foundation was<br />
created in 1984 by the then mayor of Baltimore to help raise funds for the city’s public parks and park<br />
programming. More recently, the (now former) mayor of Detroit, Dave Bing, has looked at creating such a<br />
foundation for that city’s public park and rec facilities.<br />
• Consider joint delivery: The Phillips Community Center in Minneapolis was saved from demolition 53<br />
by community activists and is now run by an innovative public/private partnership composed of the<br />
Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB), which operates the gym and teen center as a park<br />
facility, and four non-profit programmatically compatible tenants who rent their own space in the facility.<br />
Management of the facility and the maintenance/renovation fund are in the hands of the partnership of<br />
stakeholders. This is the first time the MPRB has entered into such a joint structure. A Memorandum of<br />
Understanding was created to allow a fifth group (Minneapolis Swims) to raise money for the renovation<br />
and future operation of the pool.<br />
53<br />
The center was attached to a now-demolished school and returned to the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board in poor condition by a long-time tenant. It was<br />
scheduled for demolition on cost grounds.<br />
Raising Money | 90