Marija ratkoviÄ - Hrvatski filmski savez
Marija ratkoviÄ - Hrvatski filmski savez
Marija ratkoviÄ - Hrvatski filmski savez
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SELEKCIJSKA KOMISIJA<br />
36<br />
the jury see them among a multitude<br />
of others and do not have a<br />
lot of time to assess them.<br />
The experience of seeing and<br />
evaluating the films this year was<br />
drastically different from the last<br />
year when I had the opportunity<br />
and honour to do it for the first<br />
time. From the start I was strict,<br />
critical and suspicious and I noticed<br />
and followed the improvement<br />
or decline of certain authors<br />
and clubs. What I kept<br />
wondering while I watched about<br />
300 entered films sometimes<br />
made me worry, but perhaps we<br />
will find out the answer to those<br />
questions some day. How come<br />
that some of the “smaller” clubs,<br />
which last year after workshops<br />
produced 4 or 5 excellent films,<br />
this year did not enter a single<br />
film or a single good one? Is it<br />
possible that after setting the bar<br />
so high, nobody made any films<br />
for a whole year? If these people<br />
have moved on and outgrown<br />
high school film, where are their<br />
successors?<br />
How to stop mentors who<br />
have too much influence on the<br />
film and how to control this in<br />
the first place? Some mentors<br />
appear as cinematographers on<br />
the films’ credits, which is fair to<br />
an extent, but can a film based on<br />
the steady hand of the mentor as<br />
cinematographer even be called<br />
a high school film? What about<br />
mentors who are often editors of<br />
these films? What about the films<br />
in which this influence is not visible<br />
in the credits but is found out<br />
only much later? What to make<br />
of mentors who enter their own<br />
film as high school film and maybe<br />
even receive awards for it?<br />
What is a short documentary<br />
film and how long should it take<br />
to make it? This year there are<br />
different versions of it, both good<br />
and bad, but the main problem is<br />
that there are really few documentaries.<br />
What has happened<br />
to the great animators from children’s<br />
festivals? Where are those<br />
once talented primary school<br />
kids? Why do they stop making<br />
films? Where are the last year's<br />
excellent documentary filmmakers<br />
from Vukovar and the hi-tech<br />
kids from Istria? Where are those<br />
from whom we expected to see<br />
progress in the last year but who<br />
did not enter any films?<br />
We have also seen many shots<br />
with poor sharpness – it means<br />
the young filmmakers have<br />
switched to manual shooting but<br />
they have not quite mastered<br />
it yet… We have seen blocks of<br />
workshop films shot in front of<br />
the same house with actors wearing<br />
the same T-shirts… We have<br />
seen very immature films and<br />
overly serious films, films at the<br />
level of a joke and one day worth<br />
of shooting and we have seen<br />
the films which make all of this<br />
worth the while. So - enjoy it!