11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

100 The <strong>Life</strong>-Cycle <strong>Hypothesis</strong><br />

to the latter, and (ii) a permanent burden on society as a whole to the extent that<br />

the stock <strong>of</strong> capital is permanently reduced by dD—less any increase in W resulting<br />

directly from dD. 35 In so far as in the immediate post-war period the government,<br />

to speed up the reconstruction, pushes capital formation by raising taxes<br />

and creating a surplus, the long-run effect is eliminated. But the burden <strong>of</strong> debt<br />

financing is placed to that extent on those living in the relevant post-war period,<br />

which may again consist in part <strong>of</strong> the very same war generation.<br />

If inflation is permitted to develop in the course <strong>of</strong> the war or immediately<br />

following it our analysis remains valid, provided the increment in the debt is<br />

measured in real, rather than money, terms. This net real increment can be<br />

expressed as<br />

D0<br />

+ dD<br />

- D0<br />

,<br />

1+<br />

dP<br />

where D 0 is the pre-war debt and dP is the relative increase in the price level in<br />

the course <strong>of</strong> the war inflation. The above quantity, it will be noted, may even be<br />

negative if<br />

dP ><br />

dD ,<br />

D<br />

0<br />

i.e., if the increase in prices exceeds the relative increase in the debt. In this case<br />

the war generation will be made to carry even more than the cost <strong>of</strong> the war<br />

(unless its plight is improved by post-war transfers <strong>of</strong> in<strong>com</strong>e); and later generations<br />

may conceivably end up by benefiting from the war, at least following the<br />

transient period <strong>of</strong> high saving rates and rapid capital accumulation. Perhaps<br />

the picture we have been drawing has some relevance for an understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

the post-war experience <strong>of</strong> such countries as Germany, Italy, and Japan.<br />

It seems hardly necessary to point out that our analysis in no way implies that<br />

in financing a war the use <strong>of</strong> debt should necessarily be minimised. Quite aside<br />

from obvious incentive considerations, there may be perfectly good equity<br />

reasons for lightening the burden <strong>of</strong> the generation that suffered through the war<br />

by granting them a more <strong>com</strong>fortable life after the war, at the expense <strong>of</strong> later<br />

generations.<br />

We <strong>com</strong>e finally to the effects <strong>of</strong> debt generated as a counter-cyclical measure.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the <strong>com</strong>plexity <strong>of</strong> the problem, we shall have to limit ourselves to a<br />

sketchy treatment <strong>of</strong> a limited class <strong>of</strong> situations. Our main concern is to show<br />

that, even in this case, debt financing, though quite advantageous to the current<br />

generation, will generally not be costless to future generations, at least in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> gross burden.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!