11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

342 Miscellanea<br />

are equal: one must also show that, no other value <strong>of</strong> X, would be sustainable.<br />

Keynes’s masterly contribution consists in demonstrating that when X differs<br />

from X*, and there is therefore an excess demand (or excess supply) <strong>of</strong> money,<br />

a mechanism is triggered m that pushes X toward X*, reducing the excess demand<br />

(or supply) until it is eliminated, when X equals X*.<br />

In order to carry out this demonstration, he had to “invent” and elaborate a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> concepts and interactions that were either new or neglected by the pre-<br />

Keynesian theory, and in particular by the classical theory. In the process, he gave<br />

rise to a new branch <strong>of</strong> economics, known as Macroeconomics, including a subbranch,<br />

international macroeconomics and Finance.<br />

IV The Keynesian Mechanism<br />

The foundations <strong>of</strong> the Keynesian construction are provided by four major building<br />

blocks: Liquidity Preference, The Investment Function, The Consumption<br />

Function, and The Investment Multiplier.<br />

IV.1 Liquidity Preference<br />

Liquidity Preference is generally identified with the proposition that the demand<br />

for money depends also on the interest rate, and is frequently regarded as an interesting<br />

minor refinement to the theory <strong>of</strong> money demand. In reality it brings to<br />

light a very fundamental misconception in the classical monetary theory. For that<br />

theory—explicitly or implicitly—assumes that money is used exclusively to buy<br />

<strong>com</strong>modities, and hence its price is its purchasing power in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>com</strong>modities.<br />

But, it fails to recognize—that, besides the market for <strong>com</strong>modities, there is<br />

another market <strong>of</strong> overwhelming importance in a developed economy: the market<br />

for assets, especially intangibles. Thus, it neglects the fact that money is also<br />

extensively used (and growingly so) to acquire (and liquidate) financial assets,<br />

which represent claims to future cash returns. These may be characterized as<br />

instruments whose attractiveness depends on the nature <strong>of</strong> their return. In particular,<br />

reducing current cash holdings by a buck, one can acquire a buck’s worth<br />

<strong>of</strong>, say, (short-term) “bonds” yielding a return measured by the interest rate. This<br />

transaction can be thought <strong>of</strong> as the exchange <strong>of</strong> a buck now for an instrument<br />

promising (1 + r) bucks next period. Similarly, one can acquire a spot buck at the<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> 1 + r bucks next period by selling a bond from one’s portfolio or by borrowing<br />

at the rate r from the market or an intermediary. Thus (1 + r) is the quantity<br />

<strong>of</strong> money that has to be paid in the next period, per unit <strong>of</strong> money delivered<br />

in the current period, or the price <strong>of</strong> “money” (now) in terms <strong>of</strong> money next<br />

period. The classics refer to 1/P as the purchasing power or price <strong>of</strong> money in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!