11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

292 Miscellanea<br />

Intuitively, we know that this operation will reduce the risk, but also decrease<br />

the expected return <strong>of</strong> the portfolio (provided the original portfolio had a positive<br />

excess return). Indeed, if we sell, say, d i % <strong>of</strong> the portfolio and use the proceeds<br />

to purchase riskless securities, this will reduce the dispersion (sigma) <strong>of</strong><br />

the returns <strong>of</strong> the portfolio by d i % (because d i % <strong>of</strong> the returns will have been<br />

made constant). It also reduces the excess return <strong>of</strong> the portfolio by the same d i %.<br />

Similarly, by levering a portfolio we mean increasing the investment in the<br />

portfolio through borrowing. Intuitively, we know that this will increase the risk,<br />

and also increase the expected return <strong>of</strong> the portfolio (again, assuming a positive<br />

excess return on the original portfolio). If an additional amount, say, d i %, is<br />

invested in the portfolio, and this investment is financed by borrowing, then both<br />

the sigma and the excess return <strong>of</strong> the portfolio will increase by d i %.<br />

The risk-adjusted return <strong>of</strong> portfolio i, or RAP(i), is the return <strong>of</strong> portfolio i,<br />

levered by an amount d i (d i positive or negative), where d i is defined as the leverage<br />

required to make portfolio i risk-equivalent to the market, i.e., to make its<br />

sigma, s(i), match that <strong>of</strong> the market. The value <strong>of</strong> d i can be inferred from this<br />

definition:<br />

s()= i ( 1+<br />

d i ) s i = s M<br />

(12.1)<br />

which implies:<br />

d = s s -1<br />

i M i<br />

(12.2)<br />

Taking into account the interest on d i , which is the amount borrowed (if d i is<br />

positive) or lent (if d i is negative), we find: 3<br />

RAP()= i r()= i ( 1+<br />

d ) r - d r<br />

(12.3)<br />

i i i f<br />

Substituting equation (12.2) into equation (12.3), we can rewrite RAP as:<br />

RAP()= i ( s s ) r - [( s s )-1] r = ( s s )( r - r )+ r<br />

M i i M i f M i i f f<br />

(12.4)<br />

Using the definition <strong>of</strong> e i , we can also rewrite RAP as:<br />

RAP()= i ( s s ) e + r = e()+<br />

i r<br />

where<br />

ei ()= ( s s ) e<br />

M i i f f<br />

M i i<br />

(12.5)<br />

(12.6)<br />

Thus RAP(i) can be <strong>com</strong>puted from total returns, using equation (12.4), or from<br />

excess returns using equation (12.5).<br />

We see from equation (12.5) that e(i) = RAP(i) - r f . That is, RAP(i) and e(i)<br />

differ only by r f , a constant in the sense that it is the same for all portfolios. This

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!