11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

288 Miscellanea<br />

the long-term real rate by the rate <strong>of</strong> inflation). In this case, the nominal payments<br />

called for under the IPM as well as under the French Mortgage will rise at the<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> inflation, i.e. will be constant in real terms.<br />

To the extent that the Fisher Law fails to hold, real payments with an IPM are<br />

not entirely constant while under the French Mortgage they will remain perfectly<br />

constant but the maturity be<strong>com</strong>es uncertain. This serves to illustrate the trade<strong>of</strong>f<br />

implied for borrows and lenders in the choice between the alternative instruments.<br />

However, the IPM has one additional valuable feature: by choosing a real<br />

long rate above or below the expected real rate one can produce negative or positive<br />

tilting <strong>of</strong> any desired extent, slowing or speeding amortization. This may be<br />

a desirable feature for some borrowers or lenders.<br />

We have reviewed the several instruments which are available to avoid the<br />

severe problems which arise with the traditional mortgage in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

significant inflation, and in particular the tilt problem. Given the variety <strong>of</strong><br />

instruments available, it seems truly amazing that a large number <strong>of</strong> countries,<br />

including the U.S., has done nothing whatever to encourage the development <strong>of</strong><br />

tilt-pro<strong>of</strong> instruments. It is particularly surprising, in that the cost <strong>of</strong> the inflationinduced<br />

tilt must be rated as quite high when one includes the effect on the construction<br />

industry and employment, the derived effects on aggregate demand and<br />

output, and the effects on the welfare <strong>of</strong> those who have been forced to forego<br />

or delay the acquisition <strong>of</strong> a house or to acquire facilities below the level that<br />

would have been appropriate in the absence <strong>of</strong> inflation. At the same it is hard to<br />

see that adoption <strong>of</strong> one or more <strong>of</strong> the above proposals, especially on an optional<br />

basis, would have involved significant costs or dangers, other than adjusting to<br />

novelty. I would like to conclude, therefore, with the suggestion that this whole<br />

episode is a glaring illustration <strong>of</strong> the devastating effects <strong>of</strong> inflation, brought<br />

about by inflation illusion and inertia, and with the hope that the future will both<br />

see less need for the devices proposed here and more readiness to accept them.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!